SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Xicor ?
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2920 17 0 XICO
Emcee:  john rentchler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2745 I agree Joseph. We are back where we were in June 1997. Does our rise mean we wJohn William Anderson-12/23/1999
2744 Having spent the last 11 years as a shareholder, I have watched with great inteJoseph K. Medici-12/23/1999
2743 I can understand why this thread is dead, but Yahoo? I am surprised we don'steve olivier-12/23/1999
2742 Nervous, This is pure joy! Futures are all up this morning maybe we can closephysicsdh-12/23/1999
2741 Getting a little wild out there. Anyone nervous? Get use to it, this is tsteve olivier-12/22/1999
2740 physicsdh, Welcome to SI. Now we can talk directly to each other. steve olivier-12/22/1999
2739 Steve, Ok I bookmarked your post...why? So I can reference it when we get thatphysicsdh-12/21/1999
2738 Ram, I wouldn't say that volume of 435k shares was anemic. You have to remsteve olivier-12/21/1999
2737 Finally XICO is back in the + column - but volume was anemic today! Today was tRam Seetharaman-12/21/1999
2736 I guess you guys could have made some money on that little tip I posted a couplsteve olivier-12/21/1999
2735 Steve, could you give the link you are watching? John William Anderson-12/21/1999
2734 After being away for the last 2 weeks, it is nice to see TUCK back. They are csteve olivier-12/21/1999
2733 physicdh on Yahoo, Just read RB. I think (hope) DC means a management buyout steve olivier-12/18/1999
2732 Steve, some comments. I think that a private investor with the proper skill sejeffbas-12/18/1999
2731 Steve, Thanks for that response. I'm wondering about a scenario that DC physicsdh-12/18/1999
2730 Before anyone thinks I have fallen off the deep end, I am NOT saying we will sesteve olivier-12/18/1999
2729 physicdh on Yahoo, Let me try to respond to your post on Yahoo. 1) I am not, steve olivier-12/18/1999
2728 Matson99, I don't get your point. Any buyer of the fab wouldn't give steve olivier-12/17/1999
2727 It has occurred to me that Xicor may have been trying to call someone's blumatson99-12/17/1999
2726 Good analysis SJO: - FYI, 12-10-99, Valueline (expanded edition), page 45 stiRam Seetharaman-12/16/1999
2725 Not much to report on the mm activity the last few days. TUCK is not playing. steve olivier-12/16/1999
2724 XICO up $ 1 and showing some life today! Just a few minutes ago Abby Joseph CoRam Seetharaman-12/16/1999
2723 Jeff - Agree 100%. (EOM)steve olivier-12/13/1999
2722 Would we ever! MXIM is selling at 16X last quarter annualized sales, and LLTX ajeffbas-12/13/1999
2721 Jeff, ATML has a MC of roughly 4x sales. Can XICO achieve that valuation? If steve olivier-12/12/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News