SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GALTECH SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS CORP. (GTSM)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
394 4 0 GTSM
Emcee:  MARK F. POYANT Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
294Good point if you are saying that the landlord does not want them processing cadgammaray-3/13/2002
293That their lease is up in July is straight from their SEC reports. I don't Mahatmabenfoo-3/13/2002
292Their lease is up in July.............. Have you heard that they are leaving cugammaray-3/12/2002
291their lease is up in July. Maybe we'll here the famous lady sing then... tMahatmabenfoo-2/27/2002
290Wow, I can't believe this POS is still around. Still got big hopes on whatsjim-thompson-2/26/2002
289I can see that you want the last word on the topic. You got it.gammaray-2/24/2002
288--that says a single word about windmills --picture of a windmill is part Uh-huMahatmabenfoo-2/24/2002
287Once again, I am not arguing as to whom if anybody owns the patent even though igammaray-2/23/2002
286The statement that the agreement "covers the patent" doesn't mean Mahatmabenfoo-2/23/2002
285You are completely and 100% wrong when you make the claim, "It's producgammaray-2/23/2002
284---Your central theme is that Galtech does not own the patent. Actually, not. Mahatmabenfoo-2/23/2002
283Your central theme is that Galtech does not own the patent. With all you addressgammaray-2/22/2002
282Abstract thought? I love poetry, and I like business, and I don't mix up thMahatmabenfoo-2/21/2002
281Humans are capable of abstract thought. I assume that Magpower realized that mangammaray-2/21/2002
280---I understand your contention that nobody owns the ---patent. I assume that MMahatmabenfoo-2/21/2002
279I will try to explain what I meant by, "They lost a significant portion... gammaray-2/20/2002
278Gamma: They lost a significant portion... but in reality they lost nothing sorMahatmabenfoo-2/20/2002
277For the record I clearly believe that there is a chance for Galtech via Magpowergammaray-2/19/2002
276---Literally Galtech has lost a significant portion of the patent as you suggestMahatmabenfoo-2/19/2002
275No problem. I like to keep away from personalities.gammaray-2/13/2002
274The son thought *I* was Neil playing some part in the motor wars (a dispute abouMahatmabenfoo-2/13/2002
273If the son told you that Seagal was involved then why ask me about it. I am unawgammaray-2/13/2002
272-- is because Galtech was smart enough to realize that they had nothing without Mahatmabenfoo-2/13/2002
271Yes I know some of the players at Galtech but only as a proactive shareholder. Igammaray-2/13/2002
270Literally Galtech has lost a significant portion of the patent as you suggest. Igammaray-2/13/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News