SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
The Molybdenum Discussion Board
An SI Board Since October 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3267 98 0
Emcee:  Proud Deplorable Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3167GMO -- nice %rise thereyard_man-4/4/2008
3166if we get back to .14 -- I'm going to try some more. Hope these guys are onyard_man-4/4/2008
3165Added more GPXM @ 0.18 this morning. When I spoke to them at PDAC (hospitality WalterWhite-4/2/2008
3164<b>Golden Phoenix Reports Completion of NI 43-101 Technical Report and Feabasserdan-3/27/2008
3163Credit Crunch Hits Molybdenum Miner By Ben Abelson 20 Mar 2008 at 08:23 PM GMT-bjzimmy-3/21/2008
3162Bull pennant breakdown on PBX...the wedge breakout is still intact but momentum Perlite-3/17/2008
3161<b>GPXM's Powerpoint (text only) presentation at last week's PDACbasserdan-3/13/2008
3160Bard Ventures Ltd. ("Bard" or the "Company") is pleased to phypeman01-3/12/2008
3159PBX bull pennant breakout through a .37 double-top...any kind of piercing througPerlite-3/11/2008
3158Hi H3, last year I think it would be fair to say both the mine and mill were botBelgie24-3/8/2008
3157The bottle neck IS that we started mining BEFORE the mine was READY........... PayShhhhence-3/7/2008
3156Hi PayShhhence, Thanks for the reply. What ever the method, I think the two ofhubris33-3/7/2008
3155Thanks Vince, <b>And the current percentage of production accrued to the hubris33-3/7/2008
3154Hi Belgie24, Oops you caught me! <b>I think you meant to say "up tohubris33-3/7/2008
3153I think it's important to say that AT SOME POINT, we are going to have to FIPayShhhhence-3/7/2008
3152I think what's missing here is the conversion of molybdenum concentrate to eVince Moretto-3/7/2008
3151<<Have any idea how soon until the underground crews will be able to consiBelgie24-3/7/2008
3150The 62 super sacks were reverse extrapolated before I had better numbers.....andPayShhhhence-3/7/2008
3149ONE SS averaged 2160 LBS OF ELEMENTAL MOLY THEREFORE THE TOTAL LOT WAS 48000 LPayShhhhence-3/7/2008
3148Thanks for the reply Belgie24. I think we are all on the same page on this one hubris33-3/7/2008
3147er, my attention to detail is going to get me in trouble here....not trying to bhubris33-3/7/2008
3146NICE........ I think we have this end of it down fairly well.PayShhhhence-3/7/2008
3145re: 100 tpd * 3% (head grade) * 92% (recovery) * 2,000 #/ton * $33/# * 87% (vendBelgie24-3/7/2008
3144I agree. MOST stuff we test is RATED ....BUT it has an OVERLOAD test as well somPayShhhhence-3/7/2008
3143Don Prahl probably meant they were producing 5,000 to 6,000 pounds of concentrathubris33-3/7/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News