SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Fox News
An SI Board Since August 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
718 20 0
Emcee:  Thomas M. Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
318I tuned in Fox this afternoon, and - sure enough - it was airing right-wing propThomas M.-9/3/2003
317PR WATCH: THE PERFECT STORM opendemocracy.net "If the first Iraq war of Raymond Duray-9/3/2003
316Don't talk to the print media citypaper.net <i>"I am sorry,"TigerPaw-8/29/2003
315<b>Eleventh Commandment</b> 1Thomas M.-8/28/2003
314Tom, Re: <i>And they brought publicity to the book, which is another losRaymond Duray-8/24/2003
313And they brought publicity to the book, which is another loss. TomThomas M.-8/24/2003
312FOX LOSES edition.cnn.com <SNIP> Fox News loses attempt to block satiRaymond Duray-8/23/2003
311Fox clown spins the economic numbers: <b>When good news goes bad </b&gThomas M.-8/21/2003
310A Wonderful Alternative to the Pox News: democracynow.orgRaymond Duray-8/21/2003
309Profile of Rupert Murdoch. theatlantic.comTigerPaw-8/20/2003
308Amen!Thomas M.-8/17/2003
307Tom, Re: Woodrow Wilson -- Your comment leads me to reflect upon the remarkabRaymond Duray-8/16/2003
306>>the only thing that compares to Fox for humor is the 700 Club. <b>Donaldm-8/16/2003
305On my 80 cable channels, the only thing that compares to Fox for humor is the 70Thomas M.-8/16/2003
304Yes, and Wilson 3 decades before. TomThomas M.-8/16/2003
303I finally broke down and watched Fox News for a few minutes. I have never witnesDonaldm-8/16/2003
302Tom, Are you aware of the betrayal of Ho Chi Minh by Truman in '47?Raymond Duray-8/16/2003
301Looking at one of his links, he cites another person who flagrantly lies about CThomas M.-8/16/2003
300Re: <i> I don't believe he is being level-headed.</i> It'sRaymond Duray-8/15/2003
299Tom, Re: <i>Based on this and the rest of the web page, it seems to me thRaymond Duray-8/15/2003
298Another lowlight from that page: "[Chomsky's "Rethinking Camelot&Thomas M.-8/15/2003
297Just a few sentences later, he says: " . . . knowing, that our last progrThomas M.-8/15/2003
296Tom, Re: <i>That's an interesting statement by David Corn. I am assumRaymond Duray-8/15/2003
295<i>"I had been dispatched to Trinidad by the U.S. State DepartmenThomas M.-8/15/2003
294Tom, Here's an intriguing critique of the critics: oilempire.us I'veRaymond Duray-8/15/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News