SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Official Guide To GOOFS
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3539 23 0
Emcee:  Paul Weiss Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3364<sigh> You got that right. What did it go up?JF Quinnelly-3/30/2001
3363Seems the market heard about your endorsement of FLR. I assume the price rise menasdaqian-3/30/2001
3362Nuclear gets my vote. Apparently no one notices that submariners have been livinJF Quinnelly-3/26/2001
3361Seems the powers that be are opting for candles. I don't think there's anasdaqian-3/26/2001
3360Y'know, California is going to have to build a whole lot of generating plantJF Quinnelly-3/23/2001
3359"I'm running a private mutual fund, and not a portfolio" Nothing nasdaqian-3/23/2001
3358I've owned Vishay in the past, but my timing was bad. I ended up selling it JF Quinnelly-3/23/2001
3357I've got that Mad Cow file on one of my 'puters. It is funny. My solutiJF Quinnelly-3/23/2001
3356A couple o' goofs which are truly value tech plays are VSH and KEM. Both in nasdaqian-3/22/2001
3355I definitely agree with you about the sheer quantity of candidates. I also agreenasdaqian-3/22/2001
3354This is definitely a target rich environment. And we should nibble on first qualJF Quinnelly-3/21/2001
3353If nibbling's your thing let's not overlook the fact that one is able tonasdaqian-3/21/2001
3352A very odd day today- my stocks went up. I'm very suspicious, I know it'JF Quinnelly-3/19/2001
3351Good stuff at Goofi prices. It doesn't get much better. Maybe we could get tJF Quinnelly-3/18/2001
3350Are those liabilities for retirement funding? Another problem with LU is that thJF Quinnelly-3/18/2001
3349Uh, Fred, You're giving me your best horses, aren'tcha? SIRI once was 5Michael Sphar-3/18/2001
3348Well a small matter of $24.3 Billion in Liabilities might be weighing a bit heavMichael Sphar-3/18/2001
3347<i>Yet I think there will be new leadership, the problem is where...? <JF Quinnelly-3/17/2001
3346Can you say "Black Hole"? No, that wasn't me catching a falling rJF Quinnelly-3/17/2001
3345Hah! You touch upon a subject that evokes a rush of thoughts within me. Intel Michael Sphar-3/17/2001
3344<i>I can see there is still more gas in the balloon than I thought. </iThomas M.-3/17/2001
3343RMBS! Full walrusi has been redefined! Good lord I hope that wasn't youMichael Sphar-3/17/2001
3342Hey, Paul... My stocks? Ha! My stocks deserve nothing more than derisive laughtJF Quinnelly-3/5/2001
3341I find fuel cell tech interesting also, though I'm no expert. Other fuel celnasdaqian-3/5/2001
3340Greetings JFred-- GOOF investing has worked well enough to counter a couple of Paul Weiss-3/5/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News