SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
TA-Quotes Plus
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
11149 121 0
Emcee:  Douglas Schneider Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3441 RE: Trendline. I've got that part, E.M. It's just that placing the stdeep_rough-2/11/1998
3440 Gary O....You shouldn't need to. Just put the pointer where you want to stEMorrison-2/11/1998
3439 Alex - I loved your scan, (and have one for you) and checked out the results agAl Greenleaf-2/11/1998
3438 Anyone, question please. Is there any (easy) way in R1 to convert the pointer deep_rough-2/11/1998
3437 I don't think this should be private; others can be having this problem. ISpots-2/11/1998
3436 Close(0)=High(0)TechTrader42-2/11/1998
3435 Replying here rather than privately, Spot, so Sean or others can chip in. LogoBob Jagow-2/11/1998
3434 >> if scan crashed it would make display unstartable requiring a WSpots-2/11/1998
3433 Spots, No problems with 1.1 or the 32-bit beta under 4.0 sp_3. I now only runBob Jagow-2/11/1998
3432 Spots, yes restarting the app..... NOT NT. SeanSean W. Smith-2/11/1998
3431 I do, and I also have the registry entry set to default to a separate space. HSpots-2/11/1998
3430 Spots, Make sure you have the checkbox that says runs this program in a separaSean W. Smith-2/11/1998
3429 Not sure what you mean be "restart with no consequences." If you meaSpots-2/11/1998
3428 Spots, no luck QP 1.1 was not very stable under NT4.0. it crashed alot but aasSean W. Smith-2/11/1998
3427 Need help getting QP to run consistently under NT 4.0. Something like half theSpots-2/11/1998
3426 <b><i>allgroup close(+1)>close(0)+3 open(+1)<=cSean W. Smith-2/11/1998
3425 I'm trying to write a scan with Part of Richard's Buy Buy Buy scan in igbr-2/11/1998
3424 Ray or Sean, I would like to learn about MACD and what the difference is in whTheodore Johnson-2/11/1998
3423 Brooke...no existential scan should exists w/o an either/or choice of all or noTom Gibbs-2/10/1998
3422 Ken, Starting with a good population is important. Some use a monthly IBD 70/Paul Beattie-2/10/1998
3421 Scan collectors- This is the scan all of you are looking for- allgroup close(ExCane-2/10/1998
3420 Wirth deserves his circle of hell for Pascal anyhow. Let him lie in it<gg>Spots-2/10/1998
3419 Brooke, argg, Nicholas Wirth is rolling in his grave. I wonder what Kernigan Sean W. Smith-2/10/1998
3418 Yes, the scan is an existentialist scan, in which everything ends in nothingneTechTrader42-2/10/1998
3417 >> for j = -daysback to 0 step 1 do ... wherefore j doth run from daysbaSpots-2/10/1998
3416 I kept the coding simple by not using words such as "wherefore". TheTechTrader42-2/10/1998
3415 Fred, I am no TA expert either, just trying to apply simple math. The slope oJack of All Trades-2/10/1998
3414 Ouch-- <b>if-then</b> and <b>for</b> too? Tain't fSpots-2/10/1998
3413 My friend Gary and I have been both using SI and have reached a similar point. Ken S.-2/10/1998
3412 Well, I wish you had V2, because you'd love the MACD scan, which tells whenTechTrader42-2/9/1998
3411 thank you all who response to my SC/Q+ question. Do you prefer BBB update or Nancy-2/9/1998
3410 Whoa, Fred, hang out a bit. You misunderstood. Sow and you will reap; spurn aSpots-2/9/1998
3409 OK, Sean, so I'm a bit slow ..... but finally got the message. So long guShinin' Times-2/9/1998
3408 Ray, Post anything you want. I have R1 and R2 but honestly haven't touchedSean W. Smith-2/9/1998
3407 [ Chat ] Hi, Sean, Playing KKRO. Picked IMAT Sun but didn'Galirayo-2/9/1998
3406 Ray, you're wasting your time. He doesn't want to learn about TA or exSean W. Smith-2/9/1998
3405 Just following your choice of wording. >>poor choice of wording. Change Galirayo-2/9/1998
3404 Ray .... poor choice of wording. Change "embellish" to "improveShinin' Times-2/9/1998
3403 Hi, Fred. The last thing I want to do is pry. Embellish? Sure! I'm curiouGalirayo-2/9/1998
3402 Jeff, sorry ... I'm not at all familiar with the term. Like I said earlierShinin' Times-2/9/1998
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News