SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
How to Play the Big Savings and Loan Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
63 0 0
Emcee:  Robespierre Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
38 Hi Rami, I like this thread you have started but I don't understand how toCharles Holewinski-10/2/1996
37 Glendale has said it wants nothing to do with an out of court settlement. But Robespierre-8/8/1996
36 Thank you, I was wondering why things were suddenly quiet Do you think a settlPatrick grogan-8/7/1996
35 Meritor and Ambase. I believe that you got that information from Barron's Robespierre-8/7/1996
34 Glendale Hearing. Patrick, this is what I got off the wires. Thursday AugustRobespierre-8/7/1996
33 Do you know what happened, is there a hearing in progress right now ???Patrick grogan-8/5/1996
32 Rami - I too am interested in playing this lawsuit and was wondering what you tBryan R. Havel-8/3/1996
31 It looks like this new CalFed certificate is like a call option on CALGZ with aRobespierre-8/2/1996
30 CALFED TO ISSUE SUPER-WARRANTS! CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK AND FIRST NATIONWIDE BRobespierre-8/2/1996
29 This is that feeling that the new CalFed owners will puch for a quick settlemeRobespierre-7/31/1996
28 I have a feeling that there is a fear that the new owners will push for a quickIra Vine-7/31/1996
27 CalFed got a takeover offer for about $23.5/share. What's interesting is thRobespierre-7/30/1996
26 Glendale court hearing rescheduled for August 1. Glendale Federal Bank CommentRobespierre-7/26/1996
25 Damages for loss of possible profit would only be awarded if the profit was reaRobespierre-7/13/1996
24 I think there are some things to consider. (a) The article points out that damaIra Vine-7/13/1996
23 THE MATH IS CORRECT, YOU ARE MISSING AN IMPORTANT POINT. #1 Friedman analyst sRobespierre-7/12/1996
22 Rami, using the numbers the Friedman guy used I come up with $43 a share. Not tRobert Northington-7/12/1996
21 ANALYST SAYS CALGZ HAS UPSIDE OF UP TO $58! Thrifts Still Likely to Reap DamagRobespierre-7/12/1996
20 There is no clear reason why these stocks should move further before GLN's Robespierre-7/11/1996
19 Thanks for info. I plan to wait the next several weeks before taking a positiKevin Chesser-7/11/1996
18 I found the Fortune Magazine article online: pathfinder.com@@5NY@MgYAZfFq*R2yRobespierre-7/9/1996
17 The absolute maximum for CALGZ (trading currently @$11.5) is $40. This number Robespierre-7/8/1996
16 I didn't get in before last week's news. :( What support do you have fKevin Chesser-7/7/1996
15 Terry, i think its a case of buying on mystery, selling on history. CALGZ also Robespierre-7/5/1996
14 I bought Calgz on the Friday before the ruling. I was quite pleased by its perTerence N Ho-7/5/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News