SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Ask God
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
39621 70 0
Emcee:  JakeStraw Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
39346I2, I like the poetical prose of the King James but often read the New King JameJamey-6/3/2006
39345Ya know Jim , was feeling the same thing and wanted to thank Stan for being as o2MAR$-6/3/2006
39344<i>And if it is ever over, what shall be the result of it all?</i> 2MAR$-6/3/2006
39343I've really enjoyed this conversation. Differing opinions, and rational thoJim S-6/3/2006
39342<i>In your view, is this exploration ever over?</i> Something John2MAR$-6/3/2006
39341Sometimes the King James version is hard for me to follow. The verses you quoteInvestor2-6/3/2006
39340Stan I would like to interject a side note about the condition of mankind and ouJamey-6/3/2006
39339<i>once again it would not change one iota or grain of sand of the need foStan-6/2/2006
39338The vast overhang itself from history and human sectarian "belief" , o2MAR$-6/2/2006
39337<i>Of course. And I have seen the pattern for many years. My belief in Chr2MAR$-6/2/2006
39336Well, RMF, there are varying opinions among the commentators I have. For examStan-6/1/2006
39335Stan...can you give me YOUR time-frame on these guys? You talk about "eyewRMF-6/1/2006
39334Stan...you're right about Marks mentioning a "rising" or essentialRMF-6/1/2006
39333I'll take that as an honest reply, RMF. Either your view is prejudiced towarStan-6/1/2006
39332Stan, I'm not an expert on ancient Aramaic or Greek, so it would be impossibRMF-5/31/2006
39331They think Matthew's Gospel was written around the year 85. Matthew and LukRMF-5/31/2006
39330<i>Apparently there is enough information about his "original" vStan-5/31/2006
39329You must admit the Shroud of Turin is an extraordinary relic. * * *goldworldnet-5/31/2006
39328Biblical historians have concluded that Mark's Gospel was the first written RMF-5/31/2006
39327Which writing are you saying is the "FIRST" Gospel? Edit: I just rerStan-5/31/2006
39326Apparently NO one is going to disagree with me that the FIRST Gospel had no mentRMF-5/30/2006
39325I was reading this post when you posted next and I forgot to finish my response.Stan-5/30/2006
39324<i>you can bury me without casket under a tree perhaps , and my body will Stan-5/30/2006
39323<i> Well now we get into specific doctrines of theology which are meant tStan-5/29/2006
39322Well now we get into specific doctrines of theology which are meant to be veiled2MAR$-5/29/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):