SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
CLZR:a potential 10 bagger?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
315 10 0 CLZR
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
40 News: Thursday May 22 10:44 AM EDT Company Press Release Candela announces Kip518-5/22/1997
39 The two competitors I am aware of are LASRF and COHR tomTom Friedel-5/13/1997
38 The URL for the new Web Site for The Napeague Letter is: napeague.com PleasBob Davis-4/24/1997
37 Mark, The Dick Davis Digest (no relation to me) reprints stuff from other inveBob Davis-4/21/1997
36 Didn't you say, way back whenever, that CLZR was recommended by the DickJay D.-4/21/1997
35 Jay, Frankly, the most recent announcement probably does not signal a radical Bob Davis-4/18/1997
34 To Jay and All; WAYLAND, Mass.--(BW HealthWire)--April 16, 1997--Candela Corpkathy jo card-4/18/1997
33 Bob, Any new projections on CLZR, I saw the new release today and was wJay D.-4/16/1997
32 CANDELA CORPORATION (NASDAQ:CLZR) INVESBob Davis-3/12/1997
31 German regulatory endorsement, European "CE" mark granted to wide ranVerkaylac-3/5/1997
30 On January 27th, Candela announced a 60% increase in net income on a 19% gainBob Davis-2/11/1997
29 New record revenue and earnings! It gonna to go break through $ 12 soon! ------P.M.Freedman-1/27/1997
28 WAYLAND, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 21, 1997-- Candela Corporation (NASDAQ: Bob Davis-1/27/1997
27 The Food and Drug Administration cleared an advanced Erbium:YAG dermatology lasP.M.Freedman-1/15/1997
26 Bob, thanks for the letter. Can you tell me what other letters have recently stVerkaylac-1/15/1997
25 not going to get into an argument over technical analysis, but I'm not tryiVerkaylac-1/15/1997
24 Tom, I think that your interest in the warrants is misplaced. There were origBob Davis-1/14/1997
23 Terence, I think that I have answered your first question in my last post. MyBob Davis-1/14/1997
22 Ian, I am not paid by the companies which I analyze. I'm not paid by anyoBob Davis-1/14/1997
21 warrants have had no volume since dec ( last trade 2 3/8 ), but mkt makers haveVerkaylac-1/14/1997
20 Correction to my last post. Guess the Warrants are trading but for some reasonTom DuBois-1/14/1997
19 Looks like your technical assessment may be right on! 7 3/4 was easy...now to Tom DuBois-1/14/1997
18 Accumulation/Distribution rating in Investor's Daily now an A.Relative streVerkaylac-1/10/1997
17 Agree with your assessment on the need for solid earnings...news has all been gTom DuBois-1/10/1997
16 why do you provide free research? Anyway, please re-post your e-mail address. IVerkaylac-1/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):