SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Polite Political Discussion- is it Possible? An Experiment.
An SI Board Since July 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1695 14 0
Emcee:  epicure Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
445My comparison of same sex and mixed race marriages wasn't about their qualitRambi8/2/2006
444That is one thing, among a lot of others of course, that turns me off to Islam.Suma8/2/2006
443I don't discount the value of cultural differences as a source of conflict. Thomas M.8/2/2006
442<i>The Northern states outlawed only NEW slavery, and allowed folks to keeBrumar898/2/2006
441smokers die sooner, they cost less in the long runlongnshort8/2/2006
440<i>The rationale for the Civil War changed midway through the conflict.<Rambi8/2/2006
439Yeah, the religion does allow four wives but it is only legal in a few countriesBrumar898/2/2006
438Thanks for the compliments. There are many good books on the topic, but if I haThomas M.8/2/2006
437Lee freed his slaves before the warlongnshort8/2/2006
436The Northern states outlawed only NEW slavery, and allowed folks to keep their eKonKilo8/2/2006
435Glad to hear it- as I said, the phrase from you startled me. Especially about thRambi8/2/2006
434I thought polygamy was accepted practice in the Muslim countries. It may be limthe_wheel8/2/2006
433Furthermore the institution of marriage is ancient and has evolved into its presBrumar898/2/2006
432By the way, I want to apologize for the "emotional rants" comment. ThaJ. C. Dithers8/2/2006
431<i>when it became economically inviable</i> That wouldn't have Brumar898/2/2006
430Wow, Euterpre, have you got me all wrong! I am the last person in the world to J. C. Dithers8/2/2006
429People like to believe things consistent with their biases. (eom)Brumar898/2/2006
428yikes! Audit of Iraq Reconstruction Finds Corruption Worsening By YOCHI J. DREAepicure8/2/2006
427World Peace? (next issue?)epicure8/2/2006
426LOL. Well, better to agree to disagree, since we've pretty much explained ouRambi8/2/2006
425That's wonderful. I am so happy for you. Does smoke bother you as an ex-smepicure8/2/2006
424As a former smoker, I don't think smokers have the right to make me pay highRon8/2/2006
423That's ok. We don't HAVE to agree :-) There's no law or anything. epicure8/2/2006
422Well, I understand what your POV is, but I can't agree. We have controls thaRambi8/2/2006
421I don't even really care whether there is an effect. I see it as an assaultepicure8/2/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):