SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
NIFTY NINE IN NINETY NINE PLUS ONE
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
613 3 0
Emcee:  Arthur Radley Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
463 flamed out on <i>NDA</i> Yeah, that sucks--I've posted blurbs Mike McFarland-3/8/1999
462 One that I've followed, but never purchased, just flamed out on its IND appWWS-3/8/1999
461 <and the trend in GLGC sure does not look good..> At the risk of "LLCF-3/8/1999
460 You know, with five brokerage houses all rating Gene Logic a moderate buy, you Mike McFarland-3/8/1999
459 <Look at GLGC, nothing but positive news and the stock is in a "swan dLLCF-3/8/1999
458 Dude, meant to ask before and forgot, what other bio's figured in the articScott H. Davis-3/7/1999
457 Go figure! Look at most of the biotechs and the "beating" they'veArthur Radley-3/7/1999
456 Scott. Interesting--- Just been doing my own review of AXPH. I view the spin oumike head-3/7/1999
455 Anybody have any insight why the significant AXPH selloff (near 50%) I realize Scott H. Davis-3/7/1999
454 Interesting little article in Monday's IBD paper. "Tiny fuel cells deArthur Radley-2/27/1999
453 Biotech bottom fishing, don't get rattled. You know, the thought that comMike McFarland-2/25/1999
452 <My Celtrix should get a "bump" today. Yes!> Sorry my friend.LLCF-2/25/1999
451 David, I was "with you" in your humor re Cramer and CNBC, until you lHarold V-2/25/1999
450biz.yahoo.com My Celtrix should get a "bump" today. Yes!Arthur Radley-2/25/1999
449 Could you do better if we put you on a taller "soap-box".(:>>&gArthur Radley-2/25/1999
448 <Cramer and theSTREET.com.) O.K. a little fun to liven things up around heLLCF-2/24/1999
447 Now tell us what you really think about Cramer and theSTREET.com.(:>) Arthur Radley-2/24/1999
446 Jeez, I hate street.com... and not cause I even like the stock. I just think tLLCF-2/24/1999
445 What is your take on the ISIP story posted there about the THESTREET.com articlArthur Radley-2/24/1999
444 Mike, Enjoy your day in the "sun". I can relate to your experience. LArthur Radley-2/24/1999
443 A humbling, but amusing experience: Last night at work as I got bored near theMike McFarland-2/24/1999
442 [Gene therapy subthread] There is an extensive article on gene therapy on paRCMac-2/24/1999
441 Fellows, I started pounding the drum softly a few weeks ago on ATRX. Well now Arthur Radley-2/22/1999
440 We have seen variations of the biotech marketcap argument all over SI over theMike McFarland-2/22/1999
439 <biotechs are in for a rebound in 1999, Well THEY HAVEN'T FOUND MY STOLLCF-2/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News