SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Shiva
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5036 13 0 SHVA
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4961 Remember the "A" Train Andy Mark A. Forte-2/11/1999
4960 Keep voting NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Mark A. Forte-2/11/1999
4959 No comment for the moment. Mark A. Forte-2/11/1999
4958 Mark as lead plaintiff, would you elaborate here? rrufff-2/11/1999
4957Mark A. Forte-2/11/1999
4956 Maybe they are worried about JAIL!! Mark A. Forte-2/11/1999
4955 not sure but i think this mean the lawyers get paid but we don't. Shiva Cobob zagorin-2/11/1999
4954 Hope you guys are 100% right. Best regards GaborGabor-2/11/1999
4953 yes most interesting. almost like a novel in descriptions of interlocking direcbob zagorin-2/11/1999
4952 Wow, that's great. The complaint certainly sounds valid, and the rebuttal iArtslaw-2/11/1999
4951 Another interesting read! DiB-2/11/1999
4950 new SEC filing freeedgar.combob zagorin-2/11/1999
4949 Great. I choose to believe if SEC receives a sizeable number of stockholder colongfellow-2/10/1999
4948 i sent them a complaint as well. i agree that 99% of all shareholder lawsuits abob zagorin-2/9/1999
4947 I received two responses from SEC. The first one was an acknowledgement of recelongfellow-2/9/1999
4946 What was the SEC response? They would look into it? Mark A. Forte-2/9/1999
4945 Apparently, as is typical, they need a vote of % of outstanding shares so no vorrufff-2/9/1999
4944 I received a second call yesterday from the people hired by Shiva management toCurtis Van Carter-2/9/1999
4943 Once again I urge everyone who thinks there may be something wrong with the SHVlongfellow-2/8/1999
4942 Be careful of shareholder counts. Shares held by several shareholders in streetMark A. Forte-2/6/1999
4941 and i doubt if zucko could cut a big enough deal for the insiders to cover enoubob zagorin-2/5/1999
4940 Repeat of my yahoo message- To contact SEC regarding SHVA/INTC merger- help@seclongfellow-2/5/1999
4939 I too agree there is too much happening to be just a simple share holders voteCurtis Van Carter-2/5/1999
4938 Curtis, Shiva has never been particularly late past their indicated earnings rBruce Wilhite-2/5/1999
4937 Voted NO on my 3,000 shares as well. T.L.Smith-2/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News