EDTA (was GIFT) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
EDTA (was GIFT)

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2383	14	0	EDTA

Emcee: Mel Spivak	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
558	Business Week is owned by McGraw-Hill, a defendant in the case. One wonders if	Doug Lakin	-	7/20/1996
557	Mel, I decided early on not to worry about the media where GIFT is concerned.	OHL	-	7/19/1996
556	I checked w Mr F. He says it does not seem to be prior art w respect to this p	Mel Spivak	-	7/19/1996
555	David: Only attempting to quell hysteria through fact and reason. George	U Up U Down	-	7/19/1996
554	Don't be scared out of your shares. Its a manipulation to get cheap shares	Harlan Bachmayer	-	7/19/1996
553	This is an interesting situation that has come up. Thank you David Andry for ex	Brian Haulman	-	7/19/1996
552	Please be considerate about posting people's phone numbers. You don't e	ANGELIQUE LEE	-	7/19/1996
551	Thanks Mel, we must have been writing at same time. Debra	OHL	-	7/19/1996
550	Here are some answers. Boy you turn away and all hell breaks loose! From what	Mel Spivak	-	7/19/1996
549	Almost any argument could be presented in a court of law, once it is decided th	OHL	-	7/19/1996
548	Yea! I read! What's your point George?	David A.	-	7/19/1996
547	Become an educated investor. island.com	U Up U Down	-	7/19/1996
546	Over a $. Does someone know something we don't? I hate insider selling	Lew Cohen	-	7/19/1996
545	To all: Gift down almost a dollar, high volume!!!!!	David A.	-	7/19/1996
544	To All: Checked out the name "Ed Magnin" at www.switchboard.com, onl	David A. Lethe	-	7/19/1996
543	I am not a lawyer Gerald, but I am under the same impression as you, that "	David A. Lethe	-	7/19/1996
542	David, I certainly didn't mean to accuse you of posting incorrect informati	David A. Lethe	-	7/19/1996
541	If there was valid prior art, it would have already been presented by the defe	Harlan Bachmayer	-	7/19/1996
540	Mel, We probably need to check this out, however it could be a waste of time.	OHL	-	7/19/1996
539	I do not think prior art needs to be patented. If that were the case the patent	David A.	-	7/19/1996
538	Just to clarify, I simply posted an e-mail I received from a site set up for de	David A.	-	7/19/1996
537	Please correct me if I am mistaken, but does'nt prior art have to be patent	Gerald Underwood	-	7/19/1996
536	Just a thought, but the previous prior-art post COULD be bogus... With 2M shar	David A. Lethe	-	7/19/1996
535	I am no expert on this but the patent says simultaneous payment online whereas	Roland Brown	-	7/18/1996
534	David, This is clearly prior art. I thought that the E-Data patent might be sq	Richard Ogier	-	7/18/1996

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):