SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
James Cramer
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
766 33 0
Emcee:  cicak Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
566 Look, if you'd take the time to read what I said, you'd realize that whStocker-5/20/1999
565 So you, or someone you know outperformed the S&P 500 over the last 5 years?Deliveryman-5/20/1999
564 I don't suppose you have any stock picks. Andrew Andrew C.R. Biddle-5/20/1999
563 >> Pathetic justification...... Underperforming for the last 5 years is Adam Weiner-5/19/1999
562 Pathetic justification...... If you had a clue how an institutional trade deskStocker-5/19/1999
561 >> Almost every call Cramer makes, wrong - not true. You don't >&gAdam Weiner-5/19/1999
560 You don't know what SPAM is.Deliveryman-5/19/1999
559 uh oh, dr.jeff... be careful what you say around here. the groupies are very,mr.mark-5/19/1999
558 With regard to Cramer, TSCM is his baby, lets give him some time to see what haDr. Jeff-5/19/1999
557 Ok. You said <i> I guess he finally realized that since almost every caStocker-5/19/1999
556 ". Can you name specific things I've stated (aside from slight hyperbDeliveryman-5/19/1999
555 >> Mark ever considered that the person you insist on slamming every >Adam Weiner-5/19/1999
554 Alright, I've just gone through a dozen postings of BS. Wiener, what youStocker-5/18/1999
553 Off topic? The subject of this forum is "James Cramer" - who else am Adam Weiner-5/18/1999
552 >>"Must respect the right of others to post their opinions in a publDeliveryman-5/18/1999
551 >> Perhap there can't be a place where I can go, and not hear from &gAdam Weiner-5/18/1999
550 btw, you sound like a pretty negative dude yourself: <i>"If you insmr.mark-5/18/1999
549 it sure does make sense. if you want to complain (and you obviously do) then mr.mark-5/18/1999
548 "if you want to complain about disruptions, then you should develop the dDeliveryman-5/18/1999
547 <i>"place your negative bile there."</i> OUCH!! <i&mr.mark-5/18/1999
546 So what you are saying is that even if it is off topic, a public forum MUST accDeliveryman-5/18/1999
545 <i>"I'll take an informed reply from a dissenter over a congratumr.mark-5/18/1999
544 >> Years of online experience... From BBSs and online chat rooms. >>Adam Weiner-5/18/1999
543 <i>"the need to hammer down a nail that has risen up."</i>mr.mark-5/18/1999
542 barb, you made a good call last week when you said low 40's for TSCM soon.mr.mark-5/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News