SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Emulex, What Prospects?
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
788 52 0 EMLX
Emcee:  Clive Miller Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
613You are right, your analogy is far from perfect. to say that: "It wasnchangedmyname-8/26/2000
612The release was bogus on its surface for anyone who understands normal procedureSr K-8/26/2000
611Message 14276101 Message 14274178Mike E.-8/26/2000
610On my better days it is two sick people. Doc says 5 to 7 when it really gets diP314159d-8/26/2000
609If you void all emlx trades yesterday, what about QLGC trades? In fact EMLX singSundar Rajan-8/26/2000
608Ron, Well said. I think anger at the MM's is misplaced. As the stock declKevin McKenzie-8/26/2000
607SJS, <i><b>Perpetrators must know that not only will they be accounProud_Infidel-8/26/2000
606Good attempt but far from being good enough 1_http://www.siliconinvestor.com/reEddy Blinker-8/26/2000
605Jason, I agree with you, but it's still an interesting ethical dilemma. Kevin McKenzie-8/26/2000
604I dont understand what's so hard to understand the NSADAQ's "all trDanny-8/26/2000
603Simple answer as to why the trades still stand: I took risk when I bought it atchangedmyname-8/26/2000
602"Let's say your kid's college account just lost 60K and he's/shdonjuan_demarco-8/26/2000
601Well...it seems that the NAZ authorities agree with you. I wonder though, it SJS-8/26/2000
600Almost right: Message 14279313 I had my problems with the NYSE/AMEX as well. RockyBalboa-8/26/2000
599RE: I don't think how they handled the stock of EMLX was anything different NO Bull-8/26/2000
598Hey Blinker, I think I found the post. Message 14247216 You should spend your Peter V-8/26/2000
597Dear Eddy, I really think you are insane, but that's just my opinion. As Peter V-8/26/2000
596Blinker wrote,and was directed at you Peter<But I suspect you of being involvLTK007-8/26/2000
595<you start accusing me of having anything to do with this EMLX fraud>> Eddy Blinker-8/26/2000
594Re unwinding the trades ... I don't see any basis for it. Sure, the peopledonjuan_demarco-8/26/2000
593Barb states it correctly and there are many times when this can happen due to thRon Kline-8/26/2000
592<i>IMO You have a lot to answer for. You did not respond to my previous qPeter V-8/26/2000
591MM's: For what it's worth, I actually had the privilege of talking to aHoyaBob-8/26/2000
590Hoya, I fully agree with you, although I have no position at this time or did ISJS-8/26/2000
589Thanks for your hypotheticals. The rapidity of stock transactions, the apparentHoyaBob-8/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):