SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K
An SI Board Since February 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7491 24 0 CSHK
Emcee:  John Chapman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6191 Ted: OK. Time to play tennis. This has been a good discussion. Thanks for your John Chapman-12/14/1998
6190 John: Re: no free evaluation version ... Typically, successful vendors of popuTEDennis-12/14/1998
6189 OK. You did do a fine evaluation of the earlier 11th hour product several montJohn Chapman-12/14/1998
6188 Hmm? that is interesting. Wonder why they did not include pricing in the mail oJohn Chapman-12/14/1998
6187 John: Re: Norton 2000 pricing. shop.symantec.com TED TEDennis-12/14/1998
6186 John: I think you've overstepped your boundary a bit. Please point out wheTEDennis-12/14/1998
6185 Ted and Bill. By the way you had better check out Norton 2000. It claims to scJohn Chapman-12/14/1998
6184 Ted: I didn't think you were saying All were worthless. That puts us back John Chapman-12/14/1998
6183 Those marketing guys!&#151you try scrubbing, you try soaking, and still youBill Ulrich-12/14/1998
6182 Bill: OK I will check back with them. If not for Discover Y2K I would not know John Chapman-12/14/1998
6181 RE: What next? Not to worry&#151since it's December 1998, there is no dBill Ulrich-12/14/1998
6180 John: I didn't evaluate "Norton 2000". However, since it was devTEDennis-12/14/1998
6179 Ted: Then you are saying Norton 2000 is worthless? I ordered their white paper,John Chapman-12/14/1998
6178 John: Amen, brother! TED TEDennis-12/14/1998
6177 Ted: therefore All the Y2K programs you have tested are worthless and you have John Chapman-12/14/1998
6176 You have done worse than that. You have double negatived on a non doubled post jhild-12/14/1998
6175 In Canada when you buy a house, you have to sign an affidavit that "You arISOMAN-12/14/1998
6174 Maybe the files that were identified as non-compliant, aren't non-compliantTEDennis-12/14/1998
6173 Bill: Thanks for the Quicken links. I tried them and they do not provide a Y2K John Chapman-12/14/1998
6172 Microsoft's is here: microsoft.com And I might add that none of this stufBill Ulrich-12/14/1998
6171 Or, you could visit IBM's Y2K site at: www2.software.ibm.com It lists allTEDennis-12/14/1998
6170 Intuit describes their product-by-product Y2K compliance here: intuit.com and Bill Ulrich-12/14/1998
6169 I have uninstalled Ver 1.0.1 of Discover Y2K lite which ran the first time withJohn Chapman-12/13/1998
6168 I have a light pen. ISOMAN-12/10/1998
6167 A thousand pardons, kind sir. I didn't know I was in the presence of antiqTEDennis-12/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News