SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Merck
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1580 80 0 MRK
Emcee:  Alfred W. Post Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
630 Yes, my broker told me it was a blue chip core stock. I asked Steve, but did Mephisto-3/12/1998
629 Well, Steve, $130.00 per share is a bit steep. Maybe Merck trades for less. I hMephisto-3/12/1998
628 What difference does it make if you buy 100 shares at $130 or 200 shares at $65steve dowling-3/12/1998
627 Mephisto - now or later? Consider this. If you normally buy 100 shares, buy onLWolf-3/12/1998
626 It sure would be nice to see a split. I would like to buy shares at more reasonMephisto-3/12/1998
625 Tom, Did you work for Merck to hold it that long? Check out our Investment ClubMike Mercker-3/12/1998
624 As per right line split report If it does split, it may be in April when they aPankaj jain-3/12/1998
623 does anyone know when or if mrk is going to split. thankyou, joey joseph krinsky-3/12/1998
622 OFF TOPIC: watch AMGN today??rainwater-3/12/1998
621 Here's a good one on why it's better to be in the stock (MRK) rather thLWolf-3/11/1998
620 Here's more on Losec Subject: Reuters:(MRK)-Losec found effective against LWolf-3/11/1998
619 Two favorable New England Journal of Medicine articles on Prilosec: Yeomans NDGeorge Dawson-3/11/1998
618 max90, i believe Berkshire Hathaway has never split and essentially is a closeEepOpp-3/11/1998
617 Tom, We have held Merck since the early seventies. I have said before that the RavBruce-3/10/1998
616 Wow,that's the classic buy and hold,and pass it on,nice to hear such a gooLTK007-3/10/1998
615 Thomas.... Bless you!!! LauraLWolf-3/10/1998
614 I've held Merck for 30+ yrs. 4000% gain in that time. I'll be buried wiJamuck-3/10/1998
613 Bruce,the reason is this,the stock is hot,never been better,and when stocks spLTK007-3/10/1998
612 I am sorry, but if you are holding Merck 5 years: You have seen the stock recovRavBruce-3/10/1998
611 i have been holding my shares of MRK for 5 years,and I am getting tired of waiLTK007-3/10/1998
610 Everyone seems to be talking about everyone. AMGN will be facing some stiff coHenry Niman-3/10/1998
609 "AMGN (54 1/2) is a rumored takeover target by MRK" rumor received rainwater-3/10/1998
608 news on osteoporosis: dailynews.yahoo.comEepOpp-3/6/1998
607 If this news takes on larger proportions; TV media, CNBC, WSJ, then it will stiLWolf-3/5/1998
606 Great news!! We probably would have had a nice pop, if it wasn't for the mNick-3/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News