SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Formerly About Applied Materials
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
70976 253 0
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
69951agreed...I am a fan...it just isn't as safe as investments like KLAC during Sun Tzu-4/23/2003
69950<I>I have not seen any similar actions and BY MY DEFINITION there's bezonder-4/23/2003
69949Now you are insulting my intelligence. ST > Please look it up. <vbg>Sun Tzu-4/23/2003
69948If we ever have a semi-equip recovery <g>, I think CYMI will do very well.chomolungma-4/23/2003
69947There are various instruments available to a country that wishes to manipulate tzonder-4/23/2003
69946I don't know why you don't get this. To me, a dollar policy change isn&chomolungma-4/23/2003
69945Just how do you think dollar could be made stronger via policy alone?Sun Tzu-4/23/2003
69944I haven't listened to it yet. I'd rather be buying SMH instead for now.Sun Tzu-4/23/2003
69943<I>My definition of change would be if the administration wanted a weaker zonder-4/23/2003
69942Sun, Don't you follow CYMI? Did you listen to the conference call yet?chomolungma-4/23/2003
69941<I>I think it is more appropriate to say that "Strong Dollar Policy&qzonder-4/23/2003
69940You do present a good case...but lack of clarity on domestic economy leads me toSun Tzu-4/23/2003
69939I think it is more appropriate to say that "Strong Dollar Policy" was Sun Tzu-4/23/2003
69938Yes, defining a market approach as a "change" is your definition of chchomolungma-4/23/2003
69937I don't like the simplistic light in which the trade deficit and foreign debSun Tzu-4/23/2003
69936Just how do you dispute what I have said? There were no "definitions"zonder-4/23/2003
69935Yes, I dispute your definitions.chomolungma-4/23/2003
69934That would be choice #1 - that the US administration is trying to follow a stronzonder-4/23/2003
69933<I>Since you have already concluded that a market policy is a shift in polzonder-4/23/2003
69932Since you have already concluded that a market policy is a shift in policy, I wachomolungma-4/23/2003
69931You could have accepted your defeat a bit more gracefully. Fact: USD decliningzonder-4/23/2003
69930How about the market taking advantage of a distracted administration? Jan 27, 2runes-4/23/2003
69929From this morning's WSJ The U.N.'s Iraq Follies (Cont.) French audacitchomolungma-4/23/2003
69928You win the prize for non sequitur of the day.chomolungma-4/23/2003
69927So you DO agree that the present administration has abandoned the strong dollar zonder-4/23/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):