SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTC
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
990 16 0 INTC
Emcee:  Jules B. Garfunkel Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
715 Can anyone comment on what's going to be the stock price for INTC in Novembben luong-10/18/1997
714 Jules. Re: Cyrx Here's a track record of Intc's, AMD's and CyrxHarry Landsiedel-10/17/1997
713 Harry, Thank you for your kind words. In addition, I believe, your post touchJules B. Garfunkel-10/17/1997
712 Jules, <i>Didn't you mean fourth quarter?</i> Yes. Sorry forLarry Loeb-10/17/1997
711 Larry Your, "Given the seasonal kick the PC market usually gets in the thJules B. Garfunkel-10/17/1997
710 Fred Fahmy. Re: "Here's a bold prediciton. Before the quarter is overHarry Landsiedel-10/17/1997
709 John, <can anyone explain on what basis they are making these projections..Fred Fahmy-10/16/1997
708 Harry, Jules, All, In the conference call Intel explicitly declined to give guRoad Walker-10/16/1997
707 Jules. Re: Intel earnings. Thanx for your very well reasoned and insightful poHarry Landsiedel-10/16/1997
706 Michael, Thanks for the interesting site, I bookmarked it and will check in onRoad Walker-10/16/1997
705 Jules, I was surprised that Intel didn't explain why they expected a flat Larry Loeb-10/16/1997
704 Fred, Actually it was from the press release which stated the number of sharesLarry Loeb-10/16/1997
703 Hi John, interesting article relating to Internet companies and their stock prigreenspirit-10/16/1997
702 Lawrence, I remember your cited post very well. I think at the time I made comJules B. Garfunkel-10/16/1997
701 Thank you John, As I said to Fred your comments are most appreciated. RelativeJules B. Garfunkel-10/16/1997
700 Thank you Fred, It is always nice to receive favorable comments from those who&Jules B. Garfunkel-10/16/1997
699 jack, <...where did you get info.about that INTC bought back stock at $100+Fred Fahmy-10/16/1997
698 <i>Basically INTC told us at least for Q4, there is not much growth for IGerald Walls-10/16/1997
697 Lawrence: agree with you. INTC will test next $70 support before any meaningfuljack wuo-10/16/1997
696 Jules and all, I would like you to revisit my post in the summer: techstocks.cFrodo Baxter-10/15/1997
695 Jules, Agree almost 100% with you analysis, a couple of points and questions: Road Walker-10/15/1997
694 Jules, Excellent analysis. Perhaps you should come out of retirement and teacFred Fahmy-10/15/1997
693 All, As a long term investor I am constantly on the lookout for aberrations betJules B. Garfunkel-10/15/1997
692 Sorry Michael, but I have been away for the last 5 days and have not had the chJules B. Garfunkel-10/15/1997
691 I'm confused by the balance sheet numbers for Q3 where it show a rather larsemi_infinite -10/15/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News