SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
QQQ - Nasdaq 100 Trust
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
840 98 0 QQQ
Emcee:  M CAHILL Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
715Dan, I'm pretty sure we'll be close to a bottom in the market when peolifeisgood-1/3/2002
714Dan, if I recall what I read an hour ago, over dinner and wine, the S&P is 2Savant-1/3/2002
713LIG, <I>During the past 5 years, the VIX has only gone below 19 on 4 occaDan Duchardt-1/3/2002
712Michael, think of the coupling more as a menage a trois...at a minimum...with peSavant-1/3/2002
711Unfortunately you made an incorrect assumption. I happen to look at life as a bMichael Sphar-1/3/2002
710Tom, that sounds pretty interesting and logical. I may try it out. Thanks for WallStBum-1/3/2002
709Hi WSB and All, As an alternative to straight Dollar Cost Averaging I'd likeOldAIMGuy-1/3/2002
708During the past 5 years, the VIX has only gone below 19 on 4 occasions and then lifeisgood-1/3/2002
707To whomever mentioned the adverse effect of trading costs on dollar-cost averagiWallStBum-1/2/2002
706LIG, <I>Moreover, the level of complacency, as measured by (extremely lowDan Duchardt-1/2/2002
705<i>Not sure what it means to you, not being in "bubbleland anymore&qulifeisgood-1/2/2002
704Oh, Gary North. I remember those guys, the hard money bunch, North, Shultz, RufMichael Sphar-1/2/2002
703Michael, As a follow-up to my last post... please take the time to read the exclifeisgood-1/1/2002
702<i>I am interested to learn how you've determined that risk is the higlifeisgood-1/1/2002
701I am interested to learn how you've determined that risk is the highest now Michael Sphar-1/1/2002
700<i>life is good, of course you meant..next year..I'm anticipating a selifeisgood-12/31/2001
699life is good, of course you meant..next year..I'm anticipating a sell off inSavant-12/31/2001
698Michael, this is probably not a good time to put your daughter's money to wolifeisgood-12/31/2001
697One thought. Perhaps, rather than teaching her market timing at this juncture, aSavant-12/31/2001
696I really like the concept of QQQ. It looks like a great way to concentrate on tMichael Sphar-12/30/2001
695RE:Ceph/not being the greedy sort..$4.00 is now in my pocket. S.Savant-12/20/2001
694Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) Realignment A total of thirteen stocks will be added to the Nadavidk555-12/17/2001
693CEPH looks interesting for a short term pop, and also for the long term if it haSavant-12/17/2001
692Any thoughts on the companies being eliminated and added to the QQQ? They have Roger Zucchet-12/17/2001
691RT-Anyone have thoughts about Primex? Nasdaq to Implement Primex Trading Tool Savant-12/6/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):