SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8218 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8018I have been an IBM shareholder for several years, and have done business with thBookdon-12/3/2004
8017I just read the news myself over at Yahoo! and was hoping to find comments from Lynn-12/3/2004
8016IBM selling PC unit biz.yahoo.comGottfried-12/3/2004
8015IBM is boring. VCLK is an internet advertising pure play trading at 25x if you Elroy-10/20/2004
8014ibm is a company and a stock which deserves more attention herehdl-10/19/2004
8013<b>What's in the Box? Radio Tags Know That, and More</b> nytimeGlenn Petersen-9/27/2004
8012Wireless infrastructure.Arrow Hd.-9/24/2004
8011Arrow Hd, Thanks for the response. I guess the pension is still safe. AlthoughDon Hurst-9/23/2004
8010Don, sorry for the delay, just saw the note. This is a complicated subject. AArrow Hd.-9/21/2004
8009Arrow Hd, Re the JPMorgan Chase deal: Can you comment on the significance to IBMDon Hurst-9/16/2004
8008In this climate, relative strength with respect to the DOW may not be much to wrdavidtrx-7/26/2004
8007David, IBM relative strength with respect to the DOW has been increasing since tGottfried-7/26/2004
8006Perhaps you're right but my read is it is much more likely the stock will dedavidtrx-7/26/2004
8005I wouldn't be surprised if IBM went up over the next 1-2 months as money leaElroy-7/20/2004
8004Maybe someday the dividend will be back to where it was but when they had to cutArrow Hd.-7/17/2004
8003Thanks for the update. I'd sure like it if IBM started to restore the dividKirk ©-7/16/2004
8002IBM had a decent report this evening. Listened to the CC and came away with theArrow Hd.-7/15/2004
8001IMHO the future for IBM is as good or better than any comparable institution. IRaymond L. Stevens-6/5/2004
8000IBM has changed in a great many ways. I believe it will transition to a "seBookdon-6/1/2004
7999Curious about anyone's views on IBM over the long haul, say 5, 10 or 20 yearDavid-5/29/2004
7998From Briefing.com: 6:33PM (5/4/04) 2:07PM IBM comments on sell-side research reKirk ©-5/4/2004
7997I don't think IBM will get out of semiconductors though they will focus on tArrow Hd.-4/21/2004
7996I have long thought that IBM will "get out" of the semiconductor manufBookdon-4/20/2004
7995SCO must provide the court with specifics on IBM's "infringement" Robert Scott Diver-4/19/2004
7994Your right, all of the former posters who had a lot to contribute kind of disappArrow Hd.-4/16/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News