SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1715 22 0
Emcee:  deepenergyfella Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
815Ray, RE: "The replacement of Curt Hebert by Pat Wood III ought to be very gSam-8/7/2001
814Hi portage, Re: Hewlett's think tank on energy: Do you suppose that the sRaymond Duray-8/7/2001
813True Roger, but we still don't know if our vote didn't count, or they diportage-8/7/2001
812"luckily we have a way of correcting these excesses through voting in this Roger A. Babb-8/5/2001
811Ray, luckily we have a way of correcting these excesses through voting in this cportage-8/4/2001
810The intro to a major article in today's Barron's. If you are a subscribejayhawk969-8/4/2001
809Hi portage, I concur with your views and would have to say that my radical vociRaymond Duray-8/3/2001
808What amazes me is how these guys have learned to fine tune their messages enoughportage-8/3/2001
807Has it troubled you as it has me that the WTO "free market" corporate Raymond Duray-8/3/2001
806Ray, you talkin' about the neanderthal and his pet chimp ? Problem I see isportage-8/3/2001
805Zeuspaul, The Republican Party is becoming unglued, and not a moment too soon.Raymond Duray-8/3/2001
804IMHO Gov. Davis has played his hand as well as it could be played (he was dealt DavesM-8/3/2001
803<i>a couple of the Democrats in opposition to the Bush energy bill noted Zeuspaul-8/2/2001
802Oh yeah, Glynn, LOL....I almost forgot about that shiny-headed doofus. He'sportage-8/2/2001
801Whatever...... Hey, thanks, you just keep feeding us more reasons to re-regulatportage-8/2/2001
800Thanks Dan, I appreciate the cheerleading toward being my own CEO. Since I'Raymond Duray-8/2/2001
799<<You all seem to be wreckers>> You too can be a CEO. It costs aboutDaniel G. DeBusschere-8/2/2001
798Hi Dan, <i>. But you have to keep the nasty stockholders happy or they wRaymond Duray-8/2/2001
797<<Your response seems extraordinarily disproportionate to the facts.>&gDaniel G. DeBusschere-8/2/2001
796Hi Daniel, Re: <i>corporate management must maximize profits for the shaRaymond Duray-8/2/2001
795<<they would have called his bluff>> In the world of buyer meets selDaniel G. DeBusschere-8/2/2001
794<<Guys, the utilities are on their ass and I am the only one that can pay Sam-8/2/2001
793<<if someone held a gun to your head >> I did not see any gun held tDaniel G. DeBusschere-8/2/2001
792<<Drill and Spill Cheney's secret energy panel>> = left wing radDaniel G. DeBusschere-8/2/2001
791Hi Zeuspaul, Re: Profits 101 - LOL! Thanks for that one. Yesterday, in the debRaymond Duray-8/2/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):