SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8533You are a moron. What exactly is a demolib pinhead? Please provide an authoritcosmicforce-4/12/2002
8532Unless there is something illegal about them, I hope they made lots of money. Jjlallen-4/12/2002
8531Sexual harassment has to be <i>unwelcome</i> sexual conduct.cosmicforce-4/12/2002
8530LOL! You cite this obviously partisan demolib pinhead website as a source? Ljlallen-4/12/2002
8529Okay, not a true believer. An ideologue. Much better. Do you know about Bush cosmicforce-4/12/2002
8528<i>not criminal.</i> <sarcasm ON> Thank you for enlightening Lazarus_Long-4/12/2002
8527Quit spamming me.Bald Eagle-4/12/2002
8526realchange.org Ah true believers. Good to know some things never change.cosmicforce-4/12/2002
8525The Republican party never embraced Duke as the Dems did with Traficant, Condit jlallen-4/12/2002
8524Brilliant mind. Personally flawed. He's a hypocrite and yet, I rank him sligjlallen-4/12/2002
8523Sorry. That has proven to be a bogus allegation.jlallen-4/12/2002
8522What is your stand on Gingrich?cosmicforce-4/12/2002
8521<i>Distasteful (pardon the pun) but not criminal.</i> I don't tjlallen-4/12/2002
8520Should we discuss Newt Gingrich dumping his cancer-ridden wife while the Republicosmicforce-4/12/2002
8519You get an "A+" on that one.Lazarus_Long-4/12/2002
8518Jealous? Rates zero for me: consenting adults. Distasteful (pardon the pun) cosmicforce-4/12/2002
8517ROFL!jlallen-4/12/2002
8516Television would have eaten Lincoln alive. No Emancipation Proclamation, no 14tLazarus_Long-4/12/2002
8515Hey, you know Clinton had characteristic movements too, you know. He liked to dLazarus_Long-4/12/2002
8514<i>Do you have any thoughts on why some people see a Bush smirk and othersLazarus_Long-4/12/2002
8513I remember when he was stone-walling with his "what does <i>"isSolon-4/12/2002
8512I'm sure that Democrats were as happy about Condit and Traficant as RepublicBald Eagle-4/12/2002
8511Gore doesn't creep me out. I feel a little embarrassed for him, though, becPoet-4/12/2002
8510Clinton made some bad mistakes, imo. Failure to act in Rwanda in a timely way beE-4/12/2002
8509That's all true. Though i haven't been talking about physical perfectionE-4/12/2002
8508Nicely said.Poet-4/12/2002
8507Thanks to all who responded. I clipped them and passed them along to the friendLane3-4/12/2002
8506As parents, we need to assist each other as often as possible...jlallen-4/12/2002
8505<i>Lest I imply I think that only the Bushes have revealing facial expressRambi-4/12/2002
8504Yeah, I agree with you about Clinton. I thought, barring his highly-stupid sexcPoet-4/12/2002
8503"That was random" is a new one to me. But you can bet I'll be uPoet-4/12/2002
8502Me too!jlallen-4/12/2002
8501Thanks. I feel out of it sometimes. (I wonder if kids still say "out of iLane3-4/12/2002
8500The mark of a good con man.......jlallen-4/12/2002
8499It seems to mean a variety of things: odd, out of place, weird.....jlallen-4/12/2002
8498<i>"That was random, Dad......"</i> What does "ramdoLane3-4/12/2002
8497Lest I imply I think that only the Bushes have revealing facial expressions -- CE-4/12/2002
8496Just about every day.... Favorite phrases: "Whatever....." "Thjlallen-4/12/2002
8495Tucson, Arizona Friday, 12 April 2002 Bush marriage initiative sparks heatedLane3-4/12/2002
8494That sounds startlingly like my fifteen year old, that "whatever". DoPoet-4/12/2002
8493Good question. I'm sure Traficant will be leaving office, and soon.Poet-4/12/2002
8492Whatever.......babe.....<g> JLAjlallen-4/12/2002
8491Hmmm, I think the cartoon wolf is named "Wily", as in "having wilPoet-4/12/2002
8490RE:This Traficant guy is an utter embarrassment to the Democratic party: More oBald Eagle-4/12/2002
8489I don't remember thinking "smirk" for pappy, though I do remember E-4/12/2002
8488I was hoping that would slip by because I didn't even know who Wily Coyote wE-4/12/2002
8487That's Bushmill's, Bub.Poet-4/12/2002
8486I think you need to lay off the Irish Mist in your morning coffee...<g>jlallen-4/12/2002
8485<i>That sort of thing is what imgage consultants are for.</i> When Lane3-4/12/2002
8484A well-developed smirk theory! What are your thoughts on my "Dubya as Wily Poet-4/12/2002
8483<i>Do you have any thoughts on why some people see a Bush smirk and othersE-4/12/2002
8482This Traficant guy is an utter embarrassment to the Democratic party: April 12,Poet-4/12/2002
8481I think it might be Wily Coyote (from the Road Runner cartoons) I'm thinkingPoet-4/12/2002
8480Yep. <g> Or winning free tickets to the opera, and discovering that the Solon-4/12/2002
8479Petty, partisan, whining, antiAmerican, demolib, pinhead nonsense.......jlallen-4/12/2002
8478Dope.jlallen-4/12/2002
8477<i> He also scrunches up his shoulders and ducks his head.</i> I wiLane3-4/12/2002
8476Good idea...jlallen-4/12/2002
8475I <I>do</I> see a smirk on Dubya, but only when he laughs. He also Poet-4/12/2002
8474That piece on overfishing in Mexico is a very sad thing to read.Poet-4/12/2002
8473<i>I certainly don't think the Bush smirk is a physical, ie musculaturLane3-4/12/2002
8472From the NYT on the subject of "the commons." April 10, 2002 In MexiLane3-4/12/2002
8471OK. If you limiting it to things like air, I do see a role for the government. TimF-4/12/2002
8470That's mighty decent (or shall I say civil?) of you to ask for a mandatory sjcky-4/12/2002
8469How do you define "torture"? Is that like watching Al Gore trying tjcky-4/12/2002
8468Of course it's demonstrandum, but I pasted... I should have noticed that, siE-4/12/2002
8467If it was really, she left out an n in demonstrandum -g- ... coup in Venezuela -marcos-4/12/2002
8466I told the first one of those as the seder dinner I went to on passover! It was E-4/11/2002
8465Isn't it <i>quod</i> erat demonstradum? It used to be when Mrs. E-4/11/2002
8464I am glad, E. As I told Lazarus, it was more than I wanted to say. But you knoSolon-4/11/2002
8463People pick up facial expressions from their parents in the way they do attitudeE-4/11/2002
8462I wish there were more, though. At least more Muslims in this country who had exE-4/11/2002
8461<i>Property rights mean you are not dealing with "the commons". TigerPaw-4/11/2002
8460You didn't offend me, in case that helps. I think you had to answer.E-4/11/2002
8459I think it unlikely that that group (the Taliban) will come back in Afghanistan.TimF-4/11/2002
8458To simplify things lets just say I disagree with the concept. I almost endedTimF-4/11/2002
8457I hope you are right. There are some pretty mean folks in that group and it wouTigerPaw-4/11/2002
8456THe language of this article is a little dated but the concept is important and TigerPaw-4/11/2002
8455It doesn't look like it. TimTimF-4/11/2002
8454<i> Your logic implies that companies cannot make a profit in this countryTimF-4/11/2002
8453<i>The war again the Taliban was won. </i> Perhaps they just changedTigerPaw-4/11/2002
8452<i>the resources wasted would still be less then the resources used to comTigerPaw-4/11/2002
8451TP - The war again the Taliban was won. They where pushed out of power. MaybeTimF-4/11/2002
8450<i> The term for that is theft. </i> That's debatable. I wouTimF-4/11/2002
8449<i>WWII in Europe wasn't a victory </i> Afganistan - There was bTigerPaw-4/11/2002
8448<i> I must have missed that, when did they dig them out of Pakistan? </TimF-4/11/2002
8447<i>oil isn't really wasted if the oil company doesn't pay enough fTigerPaw-4/11/2002
8446Khazaria, Interesting, most of my information was gleaned as background notes onTigerPaw-4/11/2002
8445<i> Generally resources are wasted by lack of oversight. Things like oil iTimF-4/11/2002
8444I agree with you.Lane3-4/11/2002
8443<i>Have you reported it? </i> It was on the news already, It seems TigerPaw-4/11/2002
8442I don't think the comparison is apt. Those who were killed on 9-11 were kilPoet-4/11/2002
8441<i>Does that include the defeat of the Taliban? </i> I must have misTigerPaw-4/11/2002
8440<i>The resources wasted by this regulation </i> Generally resources TigerPaw-4/11/2002
8439One could conjecture, surely...cosmicforce-4/11/2002
8438I think one major difference is that the Jews were powerless to fight back. Theepicure-4/11/2002
8437Comparisons of other things to the Holocaust are done too often in my opinion. TimF-4/11/2002
8436<i>How about a cease fire in the religious wars.</i> Make up your mLane3-4/11/2002
8435I see your point, but I don't think its enough. The fact that Kuwait was inTimF-4/11/2002
8434I went to high school with a guy whose name was Adolph but everyone called him &Lane3-4/11/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):