SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Discuss Year 2000 Issues
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9818 28 0
Emcee:  C.K. Houston Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8643 Kinda like that profile of mine... unicus.comCheeky Kid-9/12/1999
8642 >>I would want whatever information is available<>< I would waLane3-9/12/1999
8641 Jeff, let me know how you like the Katadyn... We're enjoying our "BerHawkmoon-9/12/1999
8640 <i>The heirs found a huge accumulation of batteries, canned goods, and thHawkmoon-9/12/1999
8639 David-- You wrote: >>><i>..., there simply aren't consistenflatsville-9/12/1999
8638 LOL - Check out London's EventGuide:-)) "Welcome to the London EventGC.K. Houston-9/12/1999
8637 >>How do you feel now? Is there a storm coming? Or are you reassured?<Lane3-9/12/1999
8636 And they will be reading you poetry. Arabian Nights? Runner Runner-9/12/1999
8635 Sometimes "mission critical systems" are missed. I believe there wilRunner-9/12/1999
8634 Thank you for your ideas. They do not make me feel any better, but they show gRunner-9/12/1999
8633 And a new formula for taxing Americans? I also love these high marks for contiRunner-9/12/1999
8632 Technologyguy - <i>>>Why do they print this stuff?<<< I aDavid Eddy-9/12/1999
8631 B.K. - <i>It's not the current rate of progress that concerns me, itDavid Eddy-9/12/1999
8630 The next date Canadians have to dread is April 30, 2000 - <b>Income Tax Cheeky Kid-9/12/1999
8629 Cheeky, My pre-1991 toaster has survived all the test dates so far ie. 01Jan19Jim-9/12/1999
8628 Technologyguy-- You asked: >>><i>Why would you think these staflatsville-9/11/1999
8627 Why would you think these statistics would be enlightening in any way? An artiTechnologyguy-9/11/1999
8626 Runner, I think that my feelings about preparedness must be very similar to youdaffodil-9/11/1999
8625 <i>>> Dear ladies, my "Humph" sound is only at the amateudaffodil-9/11/1999
8624 <i><b>Q.</b> Will my toaster be affected by Y2K? </i> Cheeky Kid-9/11/1999
8623 deductive reasoning/logic still dictates/concludes a massive, interconnected cabearcub-9/11/1999
8622 Runner, These positive Y2K press releases have me very concerned. Remember, oB.K.Myers-9/11/1999
8621 From Gary North's Y2K Links Coast Guard's Y2K Spot Checks Lead to Ban Fred Ragan-9/11/1999
8620 <b>Senator Horne's Sept Govt Report Card on Y2K Readiness</b> hC.K. Houston-9/11/1999
8619 A few more 9s problems? Fair Use/etc... on below: yomiuri.co.jp Date suspectflatsville-9/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):