SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
VD's Model Portfolio & Discussion Thread
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9719 124 0
Emcee:  Rocketman Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8744VD's MODEL PORTFOLIO 4/11/01 Change -$6415 DOWN -0.77% Started 4/9/97, $Cytokine1-4/11/2001
8743any thoughts on escm? Have been following that one and it justs keeps going up?horsegirl48-4/11/2001
8742VD's MODEL PORTFOLIO 4/10/01 Change $43080 UP 5.45% Started 4/9/97, $100Cytokine1-4/10/2001
8741>>>a tad of washing takes care of the issue.<<< With the moneyArthur Radley-4/10/2001
8740grinning..... like I said, the molecule has been over-verified as being of intscaram(o)uche-4/10/2001
8739Hey! Just because I own 100 shares of this jewel, you don't have to trash itArthur Radley-4/10/2001
8738>> and it now makes sense << Well..... for me, the pink flag jusscaram(o)uche-4/10/2001
8737Rick, As with you, the 500% factor of the growth of a tumor bothered me. KnowingArthur Radley-4/10/2001
8736Not a bad idea. lets see what happens tomorrow in the market. V1Vector1-4/10/2001
8735Hey, stranger R-dude. Wondered if you were still with us. Fiscal year four at Cytokine1-4/9/2001
8734VD's MODEL PORTFOLIO 4/9/01 Change $21365 UP 2.78% Started 4/9/97, $100KCytokine1-4/9/2001
8733V1, Still have any interest in unloading the CRXA at $9 or better? When you maRocketman-4/9/2001
8732Jim - <i><It used to be that any reasonable grant made the payline.&gRichard Belanger-4/9/2001
8731Concerning SBIR grants, I used to sit on NIH study sections for 5 1/2 years, butBiotech Jim-4/7/2001
8730I think Rick is correct that the Phase I/II terminology doesn't apply to thiBiomaven-4/7/2001
8729500%! Wow, that's pretty good. Big frigging indentations in those mice. Bscaram(o)uche-4/7/2001
8728Peter and Rick, Thanks for your responses. I find the research in this area fascArthur Radley-4/7/2001
8727TexasDude, There's a big difference between Phase I and Phase II grants. PhBiomaven-4/6/2001
8726Cary: Not really certain what you're asking. A physician will occasionallyscaram(o)uche-4/6/2001
8725Rick, A question for you! What is the significance of the NIH providing a doctorArthur Radley-4/5/2001
8724VD's MODEL PORTFOLIO 4/5/01 Change $62230 UP 8.83% Started 4/9/97, $100KCytokine1-4/5/2001
8723SNPs are very much out of favor. Decent approaches to pharmacogenomics, in the scaram(o)uche-4/4/2001
8722VD's MODEL PORTFOLIO 4/4/01 Change -$8948 DOWN -1.25% Started 4/9/97, $1Cytokine1-4/4/2001
8721I agree! V1 is still picking for success. Given the ugly capital markets thoseRocketman-4/4/2001
8720<<Most companies have tremendous upside and the downside for many is limitscott_jiminez-4/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):