SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IS INTC A GROWTH STOCK?
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
243 2 0 INTC
Emcee:  Yaacov Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
93 " What do you think people are going to buy--"Intel insidYaacov-5/11/1997
92 Albert, I do not know if the software patch will cause any significant permancGlenn D. Rudolph-5/11/1997
91 <i> I am looking for the market to go through some profit taking this weeGlenn D. Rudolph-5/11/1997
90 Glenn software patch will probably work at the expense of performance. I have AK2004-5/11/1997
89 Hi Glenn: Thanks for your input. I am looking for the market to go through somewiley murray-5/11/1997
88 <i>there are some posts on amd thread regarding the bug that actually maGlenn D. Rudolph-5/11/1997
87 <i>To Glenn and All:Any thoughts on what INTC price will be on Monday aftGlenn D. Rudolph-5/11/1997
86 I CAN TELL YOU THIS MUCH: INTEL IS OFF AND RUNNING. Just saw what ML had to saypuborectalis-5/10/1997
85 Glenn there are some posts on amd thread regarding the bug that actually manifeAK2004-5/10/1997
84 Wiley, Probably between 157 to 161, since so far the problem seems to be undeYaacov-5/10/1997
83 To Glenn and All:Any thoughts on what INTC price will be on Monday after all ofwiley murray-5/10/1997
82 Albert, Presently INTC is attempting damage control. I am not sure what will cGlenn D. Rudolph-5/10/1997
81 Glenn It might make some folks upset who bought ppro for its performance. I doAK2004-5/10/1997
80 <i> But you are right for now intel is going to try to satisfy public witGlenn D. Rudolph-5/9/1997
79 Glenn there is 7M ppros out there so the charge of 2B is about in the right balAK2004-5/9/1997
78 IBM , others, see no big impact from flaw Reuters Story - May 09, 1997 18:21 FGlenn D. Rudolph-5/9/1997
77 Albert, The charge of 2B is way overstated. It would not even be more than 300Glenn D. Rudolph-5/9/1997
76 Glenn the data is coming from bloomberg. While I think recalling ppros is no AK2004-5/9/1997
75 <i>Yaacov Martin put another twist on a ppr/pII flaw which might be an iGlenn D. Rudolph-5/9/1997
74 What is the date of the split?BIGEJOE-5/8/1997
73 Yaacov. I assume the additional shares are for corporate purposes to do whatevStonehenge-5/8/1997
72 Yaacov Martin put another twist on a ppr/pII flaw which might be an indicatioAK2004-5/8/1997
71 Yaacov here is a bit that I posted about Israel and Intc: exchange2000.com ShAK2004-5/7/1997
70 Richard, INTC is splitting 2 for 1 in June, does that mean that in addition toYaacov-5/7/1997
69 Yaacov: <Intel is requesting authorization to upt 4.55B shares of intel whiRichard F Hanover-5/7/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News