SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10921 222 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Cary Salsberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9371My dear Zeev: in mid-September <b>you</b> made the following post Mescott_jiminez-1/21/2001
9370Here is an article which reviews Joseph's latest views, as well as a few othSam-1/21/2001
9369Your turnips are far too modest. We know their track record.The Prophet-1/21/2001
9368Prophet, liquidity has indeed be quite strong, this January might have a greaterZeev Hed-1/20/2001
9367Good points. My analysis is that the indexes, per se, may have difficulties forThe Prophet-1/20/2001
9366If most everyone is sitting with cash, you are probably right and no such sell oZeev Hed-1/20/2001
9365<i>One problem with that is that posters to this thread are not even closeJerome-1/20/2001
9364When it comes to technicals, I rarely even attempt to challenge you. But, consiThe Prophet-1/20/2001
9363<And probably GS got what he wanted all along - death of irrational exuberencstuddog-1/20/2001
9362I gather that you are using the "cacophony of posters" on this thread Math Junkie-1/20/2001
9361Joseph was late a good quarter in his call, he might be late on his next upturn Zeev Hed-1/20/2001
9360"<i>I claim there is no 'textbook' downturn or recovery withiMath Junkie-1/20/2001
9359Zeev: If we pay attention to Jon Joseph he is still advising caution for the seLogain Ablar-1/20/2001
9358<i>I believe psychologists call this phenomena "cognitive dissonance&Q.-1/20/2001
9357Scott, I do not see here anyone even hinting at a severe downturn. Maybe that iZeev Hed-1/20/2001
9356<i>"cognitive dissonance", </i>.... now that a very descriJerome-1/20/2001
9355You say, 'I'm also not sure what you're talking about when you referscott_jiminez-1/20/2001
9354<<i>And probably GS got what he wanted all along - death of irrational WTSherman-1/20/2001
9353Thanks for your post, IMO Mr. GS will lower rates by .25% by jan end. I doubt hsemi2000-1/20/2001
9352<i>I am really unsure what your point is.</i> I suggest you read thscott_jiminez-1/20/2001
9351<<i>Or perhaps we haven't learned much from our very recent lesson WTSherman-1/20/2001
9350I don't think there is a lot of time for action. Anything the fed does willwillcousa-1/20/2001
9349WTS, thanks for a thoughtful post. There's a new complication which may delaGottfried-1/20/2001
9348<i>This is understandable, since it would seem that over the last 8-12 yeascott_jiminez-1/20/2001
9347<<i>Two things would be very helpful - a larger rate decline than a 1/2WTSherman-1/20/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):