SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Pluvia vs. Westergaard
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1267 13 0
Emcee:  JEFF CHAPMAN Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
942 No flame taken... However, I was eating some Beef Stoganoff when you mentioned Mitch Blevins-9/2/1997
941 Jeffrey: Superb post! Too bad our Westergaardian isn't around this threadtmclyne-9/2/1997
940 Mitch-- I just re-read my response to your hilarious "S'mores" ptmclyne-9/2/1997
939 Louie: I also dislike Pluvia. Same for Westergaard. I'm happy to fight itmclyne-9/2/1997
938 Here's the type of stuff the SEC really likes to discuss. Does any of this Jeffrey S. Mitchell-9/2/1997
937 Sorry, Mitch, but I have to believe that only a moron would suggest that our notmclyne-9/2/1997
936 Okay, Steve, per your request here are my questions and how they relate to the Wendell Holmes-9/2/1997
935 I will not waste any time to reply to a person like you. I never posted to youPAL-9/2/1997
934 John, Is it true that Webnauts are the major cause of male infertility?Rick Strange-9/2/1997
933 Joseph, Thanks! BTW I was referring to Joe Grundfest, a Former SEC CommissioneDouglas V. Fant-9/2/1997
932 Lou, A logical question deserves a logical answer !! Why do you dislike Steve Noneyet-9/1/1997
931 Dear Ken/Stevie/Tight Fiiv/Current Alias, You're letting your emotions getLouis Riley-9/1/1997
930 No, I am a former PLSIA shareholder who dislikes "Steve Pluvia" very Louis Riley-9/1/1997
929 Cisco, Very fine point, I really didn't pay too much attention to that comNoneyet-9/1/1997
928 Louie: "Stevie" just nails you everytime, doesn't he? Speaking Ken Merwin-9/1/1997
927 Tech, How can you reason with someone who has fire in their eyes? See my postCisco-9/1/1997
926 Loui, what thread have you been reading? I am enjoying seeing our in house &qutech-9/1/1997
925 Bill, You certainly can discuss anything you like. I have said explicitly thatNoneyet-9/1/1997
924 Keep typing, Stevie...I'm enjoying seeing you squirm. You are so <b&gLouis Riley-9/1/1997
923 Bill, Glad to see you are going to take a stand! CiscoCisco-9/1/1997
922 Cisco; I did not see any mention of a decoder ring in there. So I will not joinBill Jackson-9/1/1997
921 Thomas; from my view point all items are open to discussion with no untouchableBill Jackson-9/1/1997
920 Mr. Westergaard, so basically you're running away like a beaten dog? GoodThomas G. Busillo-9/1/1997
919 Oh... you are walking the line. Remember what I said about uncle jake's! Mitch Blevins-9/1/1997
918 Cisco, thanks for the link. I was planning on using this one: biz.yahoo.com Thomas G. Busillo-9/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):