SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Osicom(FIBR)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10479 52 0 FIBR
Emcee:  Wes Hinson Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9804 Afaq, I see you don't mind making things up either. I never said what DaviMama Bear-7/6/1999
9803 An interesting fellow, he has a reputation as an honest man, and doesn't miMama Bear-7/6/1999
9802 David Wise, a man definitely not above telling bald faced lies in order to attMama Bear-7/6/1999
9801 David Wise, I've seen more blatantly libelous posts (yours, for example) idumbmoney-7/6/1999
9800 Steve, Thanks for further correcting the false impression. I hope that the recAfaq Sarwar-7/6/1999
9799 David, Nice to see your post! "Once when I stated that the Constitution Afaq Sarwar-7/6/1999
9798 You have to understand that Barb believes it is her "constitutional" David Wise-7/6/1999
9797 I tried the same search, here is some of what I found... Documents 1 to 10 of Harlock-7/5/1999
9796 <i>"you are premature in stating your conclusions of fact on eventsMama Bear-7/5/1999
9795 <i>"To say that California has has in place an anti SLAPP statute sMama Bear-7/5/1999
9794 Of course you can form an opinion at any time for any reason. It is a matter ofvestor-7/5/1999
9793 I will double check that the basis for ZIASUN's legal action is that they dvestor-7/5/1999
9792 vestor, I can confidently state it is frivolous because I've read the postsMama Bear-7/5/1999
9791 Now MAMA BEAR, the determination that this suit was frivolous or not is yet to vestor-7/5/1999
9790 The California legislature disagrees with you. It has put into place an anti-SMama Bear-7/5/1999
9789 I do not call the fact that a company asks a judge to consider that they have bvestor-7/5/1999
9788 Remember him? Brian, <no one on Wall Street will ever give these guys anotEddy Blinker-7/5/1999
9787 I see you think that it's ok to attempt to violate people's ConstitutiMama Bear-7/5/1999
9786 Barb, that is a very narrow definition of "law enforcement". As far aAfaq Sarwar-7/5/1999
9785 Afaq, it doesn't look like this abuse of the legal system has at least oneMama Bear-7/5/1999
9784 Brian, I think you are right; has to be a different person. Afaq Sarwar Afaq Sarwar-7/5/1999
9783 Barb, "Wow, maybe the pumpers will shut up the critics." A couple Afaq Sarwar-7/5/1999
9782 <i>"Remember Craig Crawford who was always shorting FIBR, I understMama Bear-7/5/1999
9781 Remember Craig Crawford who was always shorting FIBR, I understand that he wentBrian-7/5/1999
9780 I'll be prone for you any day....vibaby-7/3/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):