SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
UROLOGIX (ULGX)--The next big thing!
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
73 3 0 ULGX
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
73 Congrats. The real question is whether you had the testosterone to short ULGX wmantle7-7/25/1998
72 >>With management like this, expect this stock to hit $6 over time after PaperChase-7/23/1998
71 Urologix management is a bunch of weenies. Don't trust this company with yoPaperChase-5/27/1998
70 A "chance" may not be good enough! Even with this litigation out of Patrick A. Kelly-5/27/1998
69 ULGX just got back the rights to use the patent for their product. Stock is + Mel Spivak-5/27/1998
68 Patrick, No one home @ IR was also my experience when the patent lic litig newsMel Spivak-5/8/1998
67 Mel I'm not sure if you still check this thread, but I dumped 2/3 of my &Patrick A. Kelly-5/8/1998
66 Why stick around. They have no rights to the necessary patent, at the moment. Mel Spivak-3/25/1998
65 Something not too funny: look at the trading at about 10:15 this morning of 150Patrick A. Kelly-3/25/1998
64 I heard about a guy who suffered for years because of BPH, but recently underwePatrick A. Kelly-3/25/1998
63 Until they regain the rights to the use of the patent, ULGX has nothing. UntilMel Spivak-3/21/1998
62 Mel, Given the swift descent of the stock price and the fact that they raised amantle7-3/20/1998
61 You may be getting IMO a "dead cat bounce" that you may want to take Mel Spivak-3/16/1998
60 Here's another earlier story from the same Minneapolis paper that deals witJCS-3/15/1998
59 Notice how the licensing of the patent issue is ignored.Mel Spivak-3/15/1998
58 yeah, I am sitting this one out for the timebeing. mantle7-3/15/1998
57 Any comments from anybody on this article from the Minneapolis newspaper. websJCS-3/15/1998
56 I think the patent issue has been blown out of proportion; probably can be fixemantle7-3/15/1998
55 Until there is an answer to the ?? "Is ULGX's license for the patent tMel Spivak-3/14/1998
54 think 9 is the bottom? sometimes there is an aftershock within 3 days of the eamantle7-3/13/1998
53 This ILGX "disater" is getting worse. They announce a slowdown, stockMel Spivak-3/13/1998
52 To all, It has always been my understanding that these sort of problems are inArdee-2/13/1998
51 I did hear from Wes Johnson ( Voice:(612) 475 1400, Fax:(612) 475 1443,EmaiPatrick A. Kelly-2/12/1998
50 Is ULGX still "up the creek ..." for having violated (according to thMel Spivak-2/12/1998
49 In response to a posting on Yahoo:ULGX Msgs. (http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?actPatrick A. Kelly-2/12/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News