Lithium Polymer Batteries | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Lithium Polymer Batteries

An SI Board Since May 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
127	2	0

Emcee: gvander	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
102	Gvander: Okay, from the top: >>Most of the others have not committed to	John Curtis	-	7/11/1997
101	I am glad I am attracting more posters especially from the industry!	gvander	-	7/11/1997
100	Thanks for your post John! I did not get a chance to read your post before min	gvander	-	7/11/1997
99	1. I hope you don't leave. You seem to be one of the few people here with	Greg Smith	-	7/11/1997
98	Responding to John Curtis's Post from the Valence thread: I have previousl	gvander	-	7/11/1997
97	Gvanders: That's some good stuff, re. ENER's Pike peak adventure(which	John Curtis	-	7/11/1997
96	More battery news (non-lithium related): Advanced NMH news biz.yahoo.com Fue	gvander	-	7/10/1997
95	Latest news: Sanyo will increase the capacity of their rechargeable Li-ion bat	gvander	-	7/8/1997
94	Thanks for posting the article, which fits nicely with some recent posts about	Gordon Quickstad	-	7/7/1997
93	Interesting Article: newspage.com Interesting implication for market caps con	gvander	-	7/7/1997
92	Here's a bit of information on lithium. The $300/lb. makes it an interesti	Gordon Quickstad	-	7/6/1997
91	Steve, Here is some info to get you started. I did not include my holdings in	gvander	-	7/6/1997
90	The electronic battery market has been moving to lithium based batteries for th	Stevefoder	-	7/6/1997
89	Gordon, Thank you for your post. I still sense some skeptism in your comments	gvander	-	7/4/1997
88	A: << I have decided to discontinue my efforts to gather info this way. I	Gordon Quickstad	-	7/4/1997
87	Thanks for your post. I was talking about material info that has not been cite	gvander	-	7/3/1997
86	Interesting month -- Summary of this month's significant announcements: Sa	gvander	-	7/2/1997
85	There shouldn't be a risk. Even though you are not an insider, the informat	rich evans	-	7/1/1997
84	supct.law.cornell.edu <<Under the "traditional" or "classi	Gordon Quickstad	-	6/28/1997
83	Well, Ms. g v ander, I was holding back because I thought YOU were going for th	Gordon Quickstad	-	6/27/1997
82	If you are going to post on an open internet bulletin board such as SI, then an	Brander	-	6/27/1997
81	Then why don't you see the similaries of the info flow from valence to the	gvander	-	6/27/1997
80	I think you underestimate the intelligence of many of the people who read and p	Brander	-	6/27/1997
79	Wow, I guess I should have directed the last 2 posts to the valence thread. (a	gvander	-	6/27/1997
78	Correction reference was to "non-employees"	gvander	-	6/27/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):