SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lithium Polymer Batteries
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
127 2 0
Emcee:  gvander Type:  Unmoderated
I believe this technology and the industry developing around Lithium Polymer to be fundementally attractive. I have started this thread with the hope of furthering my understanding of the industry and the industry's participants. I think providing one place in which to pool our knowledge will allow us to identify the most promising technologies and identify the most serious threats. Anything is open here -- maybe somone can show that this industry is not as attractive as I thought. I hope that is not the case but would like to encourage as many objective opinions as possible. Some of the companies that are involved in advanced rechargeable batteries include: (not all are lithium based)

AER Energy
A&T Battery Corp
Battery Technologies Inc.
Battery Engineering
Bluestar Battery Systems
Compaq Computer Corporation
Duracell
Electrofuel
Energizer Power Systems
Incharge Co
Johns Hopkins - plastic battery
Japan Storage Battery Co
Lithium Technology Corp
Maxell/Hitachi
Moli
Moltech
Polystor
Polyplus
Power Battery Holdings Corporation
Panasonic
Rayovac Corporation
Saft America, Inc. - Industrial Battery Division
Sanyo Energy (USA) Corporation
Sony
Tadiran Batteries
Toshiba
Ultralife, Inc.
Valence Technology, Inc.
Varta Batteries

Any objective information about the companies or the industry is welcome --
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
127 All good points, gvander. The company does seem poised to produce a quality baGordon Quickstad-12/7/1998
126www4.techstocks.com www4.techstocks.com I sincerely hope you are not buckled upgvander-12/5/1998
125 This thread is pretty dead. The VLNC thread is the place where most meet to diGordon Quickstad-12/2/1997
124 Hi, I am trying to do some research on ULBI and noted that next years earningspatchman-11/27/1997
123 Hi all. I am new to this thread but have been over at the AERN thread for quitAriel Warszawski-10/7/1997
122 A reference to the Johns Hopkins battery. I researched this battery quite someGordon Quickstad-8/26/1997
121 Gvander, thanks for the reply. Steve S.Stevefoder-8/8/1997
120 The batteries are different. The main differences relate to shape, technology,gvander-8/6/1997
119 Are the "lithium metal" battery packs described Lithium Polymer batteStevefoder-8/6/1997
118techweb.comgvander-8/6/1997
117 One more Kline release: biz.yahoo.comgvander-7/30/1997
116 More news (I am hotel bound once again): NMH news: techweb.com More industrygvander-7/23/1997
115 I only have a minute but I thought this clip was news worthy! Japanese batterygvander-7/22/1997
114 Thanks for the info. I will check it out. BTW I also follow energy conversiongvander-7/14/1997
113 Gvander: Thank you for your input. It seems we're tracking more or less aJohn Curtis-7/14/1997
112 This one seems to provide the broadest overview of all the articles: techweb.cgvander-7/13/1997
111 two more: techweb.com techweb.com All of the links in the last 2 posts are dagvander-7/13/1997
110 New articles: techweb.com techweb.com techweb.com techweb.com techweb.comgvander-7/13/1997
109 Ms Ander; very, very interesting project you propose. I will be very interesteBrander-7/12/1997
108 John, Two associates and one outside my area told me the post was relating to gvander-7/12/1997
107 Greg: I, too, read that post prior to it being pulled. It's too bad I diJohn Curtis-7/12/1997
106 Gvander: "You will see me in the market." That's nice, come joinJohn Curtis-7/12/1997
105 Gordon, I agree with you! << I think some others in the list are in a mgvander-7/11/1997
104 Tadiran Batteries Ltd as of 1/97 is split off from the parent Tadiran TelecommuGordon Quickstad-7/11/1997
103 John, 1. Tadiran is already in commercial production (I thought you said yougvander-7/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):