SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10933"Weenie"? LOL And this? Message 17386000 rofl And more? Message 173Bill-4/26/2002
10932<i> Your original accusation was that they are less productive. Now you acTimF-4/26/2002
10931Weasel! You were the first to apply the term "homophobe" here. OtherJ. C. Dithers-4/26/2002
10930Only a heterophobe would believe that those who oppose same-sex marriage are homBill-4/26/2002
10929It's <I>wonderful</I> to see you setting JC straight (so to speaPoet-4/26/2002
10928>> to capital punishment for being gay ... << technically capital pcraig crawford-4/26/2002
10927Of course! Along with a combination of delights including oysters, olives and whBill-4/26/2002
10926Thanks, coming from you, I take that as a compliment :-) How do you manage to geBald Eagle-4/26/2002
10925<i> Who knows. All I know is that being all mean about what turns other adTimF-4/26/2002
10924How about if you answer E's questions first? Not that I have any problem wiPoet-4/26/2002
10923<i>I'm not sure what you want from me, JC</i> What I had in minJ. C. Dithers-4/26/2002
10922LOL! Is alcohol involved....???jlallen-4/26/2002
10921That makes about as much sense as most of the drivel you post...which is none...jlallen-4/26/2002
10920I'm not sure what you want from me, JC. You've scurried away from E'Poet-4/26/2002
10919Wow, how original! You must be a few minutes slow, because you're WRONG ALLBald Eagle-4/26/2002
10918Hey, even a stopped watch is right twice a day.... JLAjlallen-4/26/2002
10917Poet -- Do you agree that those who oppose same-sex marriage are homophobes?J. C. Dithers-4/26/2002
10916Now you've ruined jlallen's day by telling him he agreed with me about sBald Eagle-4/26/2002
10915Well, if "homophobic" spans the range from opposing same-sex marriage J. C. Dithers-4/26/2002
10914Looks like you and JC could become fast friends on this one.Poet-4/26/2002
10913Ooooo, naughty boy. I'm not touching that one.Poet-4/26/2002
10912<i>We don't talk it. We do it. </i> Reminds me of those who procTigerPaw-4/26/2002
10911I'd rather see him convicted from his own mouth. Show trial or not, the besthames_sider-4/26/2002
10910Yep. We love spicy food...jlallen-4/26/2002
10909The farm-raised catfish I'm used to eating is probably different than that cPoet-4/26/2002
10908LOL! I hadn't thought about it that way. Using that logic (which I like!) Poet-4/26/2002
10907one definition was cited as follows: "a desire or attempt to discriminate craig crawford-4/26/2002
10906I'd say that salesman deserves a promotion, myself. A mind like that is wastthames_sider-4/26/2002
10905I only enjoy it breaded and fried. We did not eat them this time... JLAjlallen-4/26/2002
10904Did you eat it? Catfish is delicious.Poet-4/26/2002
10903Presumably as a suicide pilot he's keen on the idea of dying for his cause athames_sider-4/26/2002
10902<i>I used to write such things for a living. Tricky business, that.</i&jttmab-4/26/2002
10901Yep. Catfish...jlallen-4/26/2002
10900I think you're in agreement with BE and Laz on that one. GRUB! Hey, what dPoet-4/26/2002
10899That sounds like just what the doctor ordered (minus the sunburn, of course). DPoet-4/26/2002
10898I think he ought to be "shot while escaping...." JLAjlallen-4/26/2002
10897If you oppose same-sex marriage, you automatically are a homophobe ... accordinJ. C. Dithers-4/26/2002
10896Yes. We had a good time. We did the Disney Animal Kingdom Park, Wet'n Wild jlallen-4/26/2002
10895Hi jla, and welcome back. The reading went very very well, thanks. A real milePoet-4/26/2002
10894I can think of many other things you might want to be proud of, but whatever floPoet-4/26/2002
10893How did the reading go?jlallen-4/26/2002
10892Yep. I agree. But I read all your stuff anyway.... JLAjlallen-4/26/2002
10891I would love to have a dollar for every time you said, "What could be simpJ. C. Dithers-4/26/2002
10890Wouldn't you say one's needed? Let's face it, no one seems to want thames_sider-4/26/2002
10889I'm sure he's very relieved to hear that....<g>jlallen-4/26/2002
10888according to the definition that was provided i am a homophobe and proudly so.craig crawford-4/26/2002
10887The Moussaoui trial looks to be a circus in the making: April 26, 2002 <B>Poet-4/26/2002
10886I have a hard time even reading that thread. And I bet I know who two of those Poet-4/26/2002
10885I have three on ignore from the President Bush thread. Some times, I just canBald Eagle-4/26/2002
10884I've discovered this strategy late in my SI career, but it certainly works. Poet-4/26/2002
10883RE:a cooling-off period, helped by the ignore function, does wonders. CouldnBald Eagle-4/26/2002
10882Oh dear. I just read last night's posts. My two cents: Laz, you've beePoet-4/26/2002
10881<i>To take this subject and relate it to politics and governance. This isLane3-4/26/2002
10880Lazarus, I fully expected you to respond. I would have been disappointed if youjttmab-4/26/2002
10879<i>"I consider you a thin skinned crybaby."</i> Not to loone_less-4/26/2002
10878I sent you a pm just as you were mailing me this. Quit or not, overall you haveSolon-4/26/2002
10877<font color=red><b>THREAD: NEW HEADER.</b> I quit.Lazarus_Long-4/26/2002
10876<i>There. Lazarus can no longer post to me, on this subject or make any diLazarus_Long-4/26/2002
10875<i>This is an interesting scenario--from a strictly academic perspective, jttmab-4/26/2002
10874<i>You must have really been pissed at spending $50,000 to rescue that manLazarus_Long-4/26/2002
10873I omitted the link to Jewel's first use of the harassment word. Message 173E-4/26/2002
10872<i>That can be changed. </i> You wish! No way. I had a few seconE-4/26/2002
10871Check your PMs. <i> I'm glad I'm not the thread moderator! </iLazarus_Long-4/26/2002
10870You consider it harassment, do you? Well, I consider you a thin skinned crybaby.E-4/26/2002
10869I think this is a mistake on your part, Laz. I don't see a justifying ruleE-4/26/2002
10868Nope he isn't coming back I think he has the right ideaepicure-4/26/2002
10867The simplest thing is to say fuck you, I'm out of hereepicure-4/26/2002
10866<i>You must have really been pissed at spending $50,000 to rescue that manDayuhan-4/26/2002
10865To put it another way: when two people are doing NOTHING, or doing the SAME thiSolon-4/26/2002
10864If people are posting "NOTHING" to each other as these two were, then Solon-4/26/2002
10863The last I heard was that the rescuers couldn't get the dog to come to them.J. C. Dithers-4/26/2002
10862Lawmakers Reach Deal on Farm Bill With Expansions By Dan Morgan Washington PosLane3-4/25/2002
10861<i>You must have really been pissed at spending $50,000 to rescue that manLane3-4/25/2002
10860<i>By the way, the voters of Oregon do not have the right to re- instituteLazarus_Long-4/25/2002
10859<i>"The researchers concluded that these data are consistent with theSolon-4/25/2002
10858You only use a lamb chop once. You probably wore the coat lots of times. One lSolon-4/25/2002
10857<i>"More than the "prohibition," it is the "authorizatSolon-4/25/2002
10856<i>"A society can be judged by how it treats its animals."</iJ. C. Dithers-4/25/2002
10855<i>The cavalry is here.</i> I hear the trumpets sounding the chargJ. C. Dithers-4/25/2002
10854I had a caracul-collared coat when I was a kid, back before my consciousness wasLane3-4/25/2002
10853Well, since they're pro-choice and the hats are made from fetii, why would tLazarus_Long-4/25/2002
10852<i>es stupido</i> This is an interesting scenario--from a strictly Lane3-4/25/2002
10851You may do as you wish. And, yes, a request by one party is binding. The simplLazarus_Long-4/25/2002
10850es stupido I did not make such a request So unilaterally one can make such a reqepicure-4/25/2002
10849It's fine with me. I see no difference between killing a fetal lamb for itsDayuhan-4/25/2002
10848The cavalry is here.Lazarus_Long-4/25/2002
10847Jewel, this also applies to you with respect to X: 2. A request by another postLazarus_Long-4/25/2002
10846<b>X:</b> Jewel has requested "no to or about" with you. Lazarus_Long-4/25/2002
10845You got it, Jewel. She stops posting to you or she's banned. That's onLazarus_Long-4/25/2002
10844I think threats and \or profanity are required to be in the mix- but I could be epicure-4/25/2002
10843I wonder how the pro-choice animal rights crowd will react to this. foxnews.comKid Rock-4/25/2002
10842E and Poet will be coming to your rescue, Jewel !!! COUNT on it. They have madJ. C. Dithers-4/25/2002
10841Message 17384944one_less-4/25/2002
10840Message 17384944one_less-4/25/2002
10839Message 17384938epicure-4/25/2002
10838Message 17384944one_less-4/25/2002
10837Stop posting to me.one_less-4/25/2002
10836Message 17384928 I have to go now, but if you post anymore to me, just use thatepicure-4/25/2002
10835Stop posting to me.one_less-4/25/2002
10834By the way- I hope you are getting the idea that I don't think ANYONE has thepicure-4/25/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):