SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11418The Q is used by NASDAQ to identify a company in bankruptcy & the E for a deJakeStraw-7/30/2002
11417WCOEQ is the symbol I was using before it was delisted. It's not pulling-up Jeff Hayden-7/30/2002
11416The WCOEQ symbol is the one they gave in the PR yesterday and it continues to woOeconomicus-7/30/2002
11415They are bankrupt and the stock was trading on the NASDAC. But NASDAC delisted iJeff Hayden-7/30/2002
11414Dumb question here - if bankruptcy happens then what happens to the WCOM stock? stockamaniac-7/30/2002
11413Dear RD: Who the Hell were THEIR auditors? You suppose AA STRIKES AGAIN? KMG isJDN-7/29/2002
11412<i>If so, it didn't work.</I> It worked for a long time......thtejek-7/29/2002
11411If so, it didn't work. Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-7/29/2002
11410<i>perhaps grub convinced bernie to hold all the way down</I> Anythtejek-7/29/2002
11409Qwest had bad accountants, too: story.news.yahoo.comOeconomicus-7/28/2002
11408perhaps grub convinced bernie to hold all the way downhdl-7/28/2002
11407<i>so ebbers got a $400 million loan and made $16 million in a hot ipo. butejek-7/28/2002
11406RD, Bernie is very smart, he is still worth $550 million (search business week).Short A. Few-7/27/2002
11405<i>Has he repayed the loan yet?</i> No, but it's my understandiOeconomicus-7/27/2002
11404R. D. Couldn't agree with you more, charging WCOM with fraud was publicized Short A. Few-7/27/2002
11403Dear Jim: I think it more likely its the complex nature of the ENRON debacle thaJDN-7/27/2002
11402I have lost 10's of thousands of $$ on this stock and what pisses me off THEJDN-7/27/2002
11401so ebbers got a $400 million loan and made $16 million in a hot ipo. but, he didhdl-7/27/2002
11400<i>For those like me who did know the full extent of Grubman's role intejek-7/27/2002
11399<i>Did you buy a few shares from these guys? If so, your attitude is more Oeconomicus-7/27/2002
11398See "At Worldcom, It's Deja Vu All Over Again" BW this week. EbbShort A. Few-7/27/2002
11397Agreed, it seems odd, especially considering that Enron execs created complex scOeconomicus-7/27/2002
11396It seems the government is very quick to act in Worldcomm's case, yet surpriJames Calladine-7/27/2002
11395NEWS,,,,,, biz.yahoo.com Thursday July 25, 4:02 am Eastern Time Dow Jones BusiDEER HUNTER-7/25/2002
11394yes, as WCOEQ, but yahoo has been lame in providing quotes. but your broker(ageStormRider-7/24/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):