SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Pangea Goldfields T.PGD
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1178 7 0 PGD
Emcee:  Larry Voyer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1153enigma - back in Toronto and seem to be getting all SI postings. Thxs for sendinJimsy-7/6/2000
1152Are we going to request that SI mothball the thread...Pangea is no more. I'mRobert-7/6/2000
1151Those in management who arranged this sale at this price will now find their decEnigma-7/6/2000
1150Barrick is doing a fine job at protecting its interest. Why would they pay more timbouctou-7/6/2000
1149It is customary for me to put out a message on a stock when I feel it is reachinElizabeth Andrews-7/5/2000
1148T: I hate to say it; but you're tilting at windmills. For whatever reason, terryswift-7/5/2000
1147To all : Please read the Market Regulation section of the TSE (available online,timbouctou-7/5/2000
1146A highly unusual sequence of events, to say the least.terryswift-7/5/2000
1145If they are, in fact, withholding information and/or manipulating events, these terryswift-7/5/2000
1144I guess no one can make a move until they see Barrick's offer and the terms.Enigma-7/5/2000
1143$6.90 now - will Anglo or someone else throw a bomb in here and come to everyoneEnigma-7/5/2000
1142And the disposition of Pangea's 20% net profits interest in the Titanium proEnigma-7/5/2000
1141Come on guys, they are witholding information. There is no ifs and buts.. The ltimbouctou-7/5/2000
1140Absolutely it would be material. Barrick and PGD are in a very sensitive positioterryswift-7/4/2000
1139On the other hand we haven't had results from Golden Ridge for some time - iEnigma-7/4/2000
1138E: I didn't mean to imply that is what you were saying. The "willful iterryswift-7/4/2000
1137<< Enigma is right; that may constitute a willful attempt to defraud PGD sEnigma-7/4/2000
1136I'll read it - re Tiomin the $64,000 question now is who gets the 20% net prEnigma-7/4/2000
1135It is viewed by analysts as a good offer: A) because their firms have been involEnigma-7/4/2000
1134Hi E, This is a good read, as it contrasts the ABX/ARP offer with the ABX/PGD arusset-7/4/2000
1133Of course. Barrick wouldn't want great drill results screwing up their low-bterryswift-7/4/2000
1132If a higher bid were offered by another company, the PGD board would have a fiduterryswift-7/4/2000
1131If that is correct - ie. that Barrick's lawyers have asked for a freeze on iEnigma-7/4/2000
1130I was told by PGD last week not to expect any results from Golden Ridge until cotimbouctou-7/4/2000
1129I don't suppose the officers and drectors have tendered because the offer isEnigma-7/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News