SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
WestAmerica Corp. (WACC)
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
749 6 0 WACC
Emcee:  TA2K Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
124 MUST READ! Most timely article dealing with sec fraud, "144", "pitchlyn-3/22/1998
123 HEXonX, check out the following: stocks4tomorrow.com Could this be the old BoDan Dieffenwierth-3/22/1998
122 bh, something that I've just figured out (probably everyone else on this thJOE TURMAINE-3/21/1998
121 You're right, Joe. I'm not sure why I'm still amazed that people dbh-3/20/1998
120 Snake, when they were delisted from NASDAQ they were removed from most electroJOE TURMAINE-3/20/1998
119 bh, I must have canceled it after I edited my response. Your 10Q was an imporJOE TURMAINE-3/20/1998
118 JT_ why doesn't this stock show up in my quotes in yahoo or djd? Anyone SnakeCharmer-3/20/1998
117 t-bone, just so some follower doesn't get excited about me "making up JOE TURMAINE-3/20/1998
116 I agree, t-bone. If it is in fact true that mgt owns 56% of the stock, I'lbh-3/20/1998
115 I guess I missed that post. Sorry, Joe. Do you know why your response didnbh-3/20/1998
114 Joe, this is the most exciting post I have read thus far...56 percent of stock t-bone-3/20/1998
113 Snake, you are absoutely right, and that was my point. If you are a peny stock t-bone-3/20/1998
112 bh, I did post a reference #Reply-3466255 to the 10Q sometime ago. I did noJOE TURMAINE-3/19/1998
111 10Q I just found a 10Q dated 2/17/98, and it says something very interesting bh-3/19/1998
110 Droffas, here's the same info from another investors efforts. Hell Joe, JOE TURMAINE-3/19/1998
109 Snake, I don't know the ins and outs of a reverse split, but my version is JOE TURMAINE-3/19/1998
108 This is a email address that I found in the source of WACC's web site. moryDroffas-3/19/1998
107 t-bone_ of course I am in for a buck, and a quick one if it works that way. IfSnakeCharmer-3/18/1998
106 Joe, ...Thanks for the imput. What would suggest another reverse split? S~SnakeCharmer-3/18/1998
105 t-bone, couldn't AGREE more!! Depending where you look the bid is anywherJOE TURMAINE-3/18/1998
104 does anybody find it interesting that there is absolutely no volume today. In st-bone-3/18/1998
103 Snake. if you look at this deal here, it is quite simple. I think the people wht-bone-3/18/1998
102 Snake, my feeling is that the two trades yesterday (one for 9 cents the other fJOE TURMAINE-3/18/1998
101 Confused about what all of the ramifications and suggestions are here... Are thSnakeCharmer-3/18/1998
100 Just checking in here. I feel like they may be holding back here from disclosint-bone-3/17/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News