SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
14610 39 0
Emcee:  Original Mad Dog Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12810it doesn't, jorj.. i think m is referring to the doma (defense of marriage)MulhollandDrive-2/26/2004
12809I will have to review the constitution a bit, but I don't remember the part Jorj X Mckie-2/26/2004
12808Not quite. If the US Supreme Court holds that statutes defining marriage as betmph-2/26/2004
12807Going skiing...back in a few days in the meantime... I am right, y'all areJorj X Mckie-2/26/2004
12806always dangerous to argue law with lawyers......:-) correct me if I am wrong, bJorj X Mckie-2/26/2004
12805I'm not using any yardsticks; just framing the issues. My point is that themph-2/26/2004
12804minnow, we all know the answer as to whether or not homosexuality is a lifestyleJorj X Mckie-2/26/2004
12803Wow! Clear Channel just realized that Howard Stern's show is over the top? Alan Smithee-2/26/2004
12802The charges were animal cruelty. The defense was that the hog was destined for redfish-2/26/2004
12801Jorjie Poo: While you may not like polls, the fact is that the overall sentimenmph-2/26/2004
12800What were the charges against him? I imagine it was a health code violation of sAugustWest-2/26/2004
12799Bubba is based here in Tampa, and his show was non-stop filth. He was charged wredfish-2/26/2004
12798Shock Jock Howard Stern Pulled Off Air ( AP Online ) WASHINGTON, Feb 25, 2004 (AugustWest-2/25/2004
12797you're only agreeing cause I make you twemble but, that works for me ;)Rainy_Day_Woman-2/25/2004
12796I agree with a. b. c. and d. Furthermore, I would never argue with someone whMrLucky-2/25/2004
12795Giovanni darling I've been so crabby, I hate me but you can't <i&gRainy_Day_Woman-2/25/2004
12794<i>if civil unions yield basically the same rights as marriage, what'sAlan Smithee-2/25/2004
12793Of course, I don't give a damn about polls. And again, the U.S. ConstitutioJorj X Mckie-2/25/2004
12792thanks... i was actually referring to the US constitution.. the direction beinMulhollandDrive-2/25/2004
12791here's the CA constitution: leginfo.ca.gov Discrimination on the basis of mph-2/25/2004
12790hi m.. i was hoping you would weigh in on this.. :) here's my question...MulhollandDrive-2/25/2004
12789if civil unions yield basically the same rights as marriage, what's your beemph-2/25/2004
12788<i>There are already laws in place that do that, and others that could be Jorj X Mckie-2/25/2004
12787I agree with Smithee's take on this. There will never be a constitutional ammph-2/25/2004
12786:-)MrLucky-2/25/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News