SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The abortion issue: pro-choice vs. anti-abortion
An SI Board Since January 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
286 12 0
Emcee:  LPS5 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
136<I> so presumably it has some sort of mixed status between abortion and biTimF-12/12/2008
135Pope: <It also said it opposed the morning-after pill, even if it doesnLLCF-12/12/2008
134<I> I would say that it's normally more helpful to folks to post yourTimF-10/21/2008
133<"We agree to disagree", doesn't mean that I'll shut up wheLLCF-10/21/2008
132 "We agree to disagree", doesn't mean that I'll shut up when yTimF-10/21/2008
131<Not really.> As I said, we agree to disagree. <And in any case thereLLCF-10/21/2008
130<I> . in any case this goes LEVELS further. </i> Not really. <TimF-10/21/2008
129<I can reasonably comment on all sorts of different murders (either the detaiLLCF110/20/2008
128 Your conclusion doesn't logically follow from your premises. Providing/TimF-10/20/2008
127In any case... it is the female body that is the environment for conception, litLLCF110/20/2008
126keep posting. One of these days you might actually get something right. AlthougPROLIFE-10/19/2008
125LOL, I think it was (from the "self-righteous tint") your goggles thatLLCF-10/18/2008
124did you say or ask anything or were you just rambling....your guilt was so heavyPROLIFE-10/18/2008
123< Roe vs. Wade short circuited all of that.> True enough, althouh in someLLCF-10/16/2008
122<I> There is LOTS of political debate on the topic! It's talked about TimF-10/16/2008
121<By literally I assume you mean physically.> I mean physically, psychologLLCF-10/16/2008
120<Except in terms of discussions like ours, the political debate was closed ofLLCF-10/16/2008
119<I> However any "rights" would be bestowed on the fetus by an idTimF-10/16/2008
118<I> It sounds nice to separate the two, but of course (even literally) yoTimF-10/16/2008
117<Yes (yes they are not separate) if you mean "separate" as "noLLCF-10/15/2008
116But in no other case do you have such a case where to entities are not separate.LLCF-10/15/2008
115<I> I started out the "discussion"... ie. not an argument... assTimF-10/15/2008
114<If you assume that fetal rights don't exist, or are unimportant or irrelLLCF-10/15/2008
113<I> This is pretty much the cruxt of the issue. Of course the POINT of &quTimF-10/15/2008
112 Men don't have the same experience of rape as women (which isn't to saTimF-10/15/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):