SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
14633That is the best thing, yes.....Gotta go! Take care.....Neocon-6/10/2002
14632<<<A further expedient might be to parcel out land, so that each has a dave rose-6/10/2002
14631<i>Wouldn't have to worry about environmental impact stuff either, sinLazarus_Long-6/10/2002
14630<i>"2. The negative component is a function of the additional overgraaverage joe-6/10/2002
14629<i> Farm subsidies, I don't get a subsidy, but I get lower produce prTimF-6/10/2002
14628Whew! There's another one..... This place is getting to be a dungpile too..jlallen-6/10/2002
14627What so mysterious? People generally tend to like their particular elected leadejlallen-6/10/2002
14626Reminds me of when those 3 grey whales were trapped by ice in Alaska. Lots of peIsh-6/10/2002
14625Man, open a window. Who let that stinker in here....??? JLAjlallen-6/10/2002
14624Sure could.Ish-6/10/2002
14623Not to mention whales. Could they be called pelagic mammals?The Philosopher-6/10/2002
14622I see. Of course, that makes the most sense, then.....Neocon-6/10/2002
14621The Clinton years in the US is only one example, and there was more going on theTimF-6/10/2002
14620<<This is difficult in the situation of the sea, but since fishing tends tIsh-6/10/2002
14619That's better than I could have explained it to him.Ish-6/10/2002
14618Why, it's simple. It just proves that people on SI think politicians generaThe Philosopher-6/10/2002
14617<i>What? You think a politician would LIE? Why, suh, that calls for pistojttmab-6/10/2002
14616Pretty impressive. It does look like there's an extraction problem, but thatjttmab-6/10/2002
14615Invading is cheaper than buying.The Philosopher-6/10/2002
14614<i>Who says we have to believe them?</i> What? You think a poThe Philosopher-6/10/2002
14613<i>I doubt you will find a single member of Congress who would not say flajttmab-6/10/2002
14612You import more oil from Alberta right now than you do Saudi Arabia... Keep on average joe-6/10/2002
14611<i>People at the bottom are not likely to be able to accumulate wealth unljttmab-6/10/2002
14610I doubt you will find a single member of Congress who would not say flat out wheThe Philosopher-6/10/2002
14609Over time, the effect of overgrazing is not fractional, because eventually thereNeocon-6/10/2002
14608<i>More oil on our northern border than in all of Iraq.</i> I had njttmab-6/10/2002
14607<i>Well, they're right about the Democratic Republic. It was set up thjttmab-6/10/2002
14606<i> "... it would create a greater possibility of more people accumulTimF-6/10/2002
14605Shhh. What do you think Bush's first strike talk is really about? Iraq? The Philosopher-6/10/2002
14604<i>Unfortunately, we have a lot of conservatives that keep on saying this The Philosopher-6/10/2002
14603<i>It was, as we have noted, built on slave labor -- which Fears says is tjttmab-6/10/2002
14602<i>If I had the power to pass two laws, they would be this. 1. Every membjttmab-6/10/2002
14601There was an excellent article written a number of years ago titled "The TrThe Philosopher-6/10/2002
14600<i>Until the house, or stock, or land, or whatever is actually sold there jttmab-6/10/2002
14599E? This is Reality speaking. Now listen closely. ONCE YOU ARE IN A WAR, ANYTHLazarus_Long-6/10/2002
14598I'd be more likely to believe it if there was a second source besides just DTimF-6/10/2002
14597I guess that makes sense. But everyone has a stake in keeping the fisheries wellNeocon-6/10/2002
14596Mostly they aren't enforced. International waters are pretty much open seasoIsh-6/10/2002
14595Aren't their international protocols against over- fishing. I know their areNeocon-6/10/2002
14594taxworld.org ku.eduTimF-6/10/2002
14593<i>Either that's true or some people aren't willing to tell pollstThe Philosopher-6/10/2002
14592<i>How much of the Roman operating expenses were supplemented throughThe Philosopher-6/10/2002
14591<i>Second, I find it exceptionally hard to believe that members of CoThe Philosopher-6/10/2002
14590<i> What I was tryint to argue was that wealth acquired through tax deferrTimF-6/10/2002
14589<<In the past, the United States has viewed surprise or "sneak" Lane3-6/10/2002
14588It is a frightening idea with great potential for abuse.Constant Reader-6/10/2002
14587One wonders where in this doctrine the concept of oversight enters the picture. Dayuhan-6/10/2002
14586<i>Don't you think it's interesting more conservatives listen to NLane3-6/10/2002
14585Don't you think it's interesting more conservatives listen to NPR and waTom Clarke-6/10/2002
14584Interesting, indeed. I'm beginning to think I missed my calling. I should Lane3-6/10/2002
14583That Pew poll has some other interesting tidbits. people-press.org The WashingtTom Clarke-6/10/2002
14582From Howard Kurtz today: <<This Just In Everyone knows Fox News Channel Lane3-6/10/2002
14581Sorry. That's your spin. I don't see a lie there. He's doing what jlallen-6/10/2002
14580I saw a discussion of the legal basis/obstacles for this new policy last week onLane3-6/10/2002
14579<<How much of the Roman operating expenses were supplemented through pillaIsh-6/10/2002
14578<i>Well, you really can't. The whole issue of taxation is bound up witjttmab-6/10/2002
14577<i>I'm not a tax accountant and don't plan ever to be. Thank God fjttmab-6/10/2002
14576Small changes make a big difference. Much better and a "typical" Tim pjttmab-6/10/2002
14575He's got a pretty rocky field to farm, for sure. Achieving anything would bLazarus_Long-6/10/2002
14574ROFL! I would wish him great success, but it is Oakland after all.Constant Reader-6/9/2002
14573Great post by twfowler that I found: Message 16100203 Moonbean: Yeah. AmazingLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14572Moonbeam has, however, done a good job in Oakland and I wish him continued moderConstant Reader-6/9/2002
14571All right, Reagan made up for Nixon. Moonbeam never made the national level. SLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14570<i>That was a long time ago. We made up for it by giving the nation ReaganTom C-6/9/2002
14569That was a long time ago. We made up for it by giving the nation Reagan. MoonbLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14568Yah, yah. Excuses. Mr Moonbeam Governor state.The Philosopher-6/9/2002
14567HEY! This is a BIG STATE. Unlike puny cowtowns like Washington state. Up hereLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14566<i>NOT SO FAST! First we cut SoCal loose</i> Nope. You can't gThe Philosopher-6/9/2002
14565The text of the colonel's letter: signonsandiego.com This is the guy who gotLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14564Hardly impossible. Cholera is a water-borne disease. Anyone dependent on "Lazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14563That's a shame. Those reefs take centuries to heal, if ever. Destroying the Ish-6/9/2002
14562Well, let's see, that proves (a) vaccination works since only the unvaccinatLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14561Around here we have Taiwanese fishermen, not Japanese. The trawlers drag a hugeDayuhan-6/9/2002
14560We had a huge typhoid scare here a little while back. One whole family came dowDayuhan-6/9/2002
14559That's what she told me, cholera in Texas back in the 60s. Some of the kids,Ish-6/9/2002
14558In Texas? Now that's not a place where you'd expect someone to catch itLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14557Um. 54 electoral votes are 54 electoral votes.Lazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14556:-)Lazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14555<i>You're already stealing our water </i> Moi? Not Moi. You havLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14554You're already stealing our water and our power. And sending tankers throuThe Philosopher-6/9/2002
14553Ah, now that's the interesting question!! I bet he says yes. And I bet he The Philosopher-6/9/2002
14552NO! Actually, I went there for the archaeology- -Tikal. It's press is muchLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14551How about if if it's your few miles? And it tends to be more than a few milLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14550In no case (with the possible exception of something like the smallpox virus) doLazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14549Then you're in T-R-O-U-B-L-E.Lazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14548More important: Does HIS WIFE know what he just said? :-)Lazarus_Long-6/9/2002
14547Yep, sure do.Ish-6/8/2002
14546<i> Wife had cholera when she was a kid in Texas. I believe there is some The Philosopher-6/8/2002
14545Wife had cholera when she was a kid in Texas. I believe there is some brain damaIsh-6/8/2002
14544<<Excellent idea! And that'll give them something to eat after they kiIsh-6/8/2002
14543Not if you survive it. Otherwise, yes. :-) Actually, I'd have to look it Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14542<<I haven't been back to Guatemala since.>> Not even for the goIsh-6/8/2002
14541Does cholera have any lasting effects?Lane3-6/8/2002
14540<i>They could send a second ship for the meat and leave the whales the helLazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14539<i>90 degrees and I'm wearing a heavy jacket and shivering.</i>Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14538Yeah, but you've plenty of beach. More than you really need. Doesn'tThe Philosopher-6/8/2002
14537<i>In all fairness, I'm not sure the reputation of most politiciaThe Philosopher-6/8/2002
14536<<Then about two years ago I found out. About 5-7 years ago the Mexican goIsh-6/8/2002
14535<i>Edit: We need more "Perfect Storms". </i> Uh... Uh....Lazarus_Long-6/8/2002
14534I fibbed, I didn't get the diarrhea. Wife did though. Last thing through herIsh-6/8/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):