SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
15533I twice considered buying it but I never did. I just bought other stocks thaTimF-6/25/2002
15532<i> Yeah, I know that the death penalty used to be applied to what would nTimF-6/25/2002
15531It's so simplistic dismiss the dp as "sick" that it's a uselesE-6/25/2002
15530<i>But then that doesn't really invalidate your point it could just beLane3-6/25/2002
15529<i>So everybody gets a second shot at wrecking society? </i> No, onLane3-6/25/2002
15528<I> You </i> (neo) <i> are into the cosmic morality paradigm aTimF-6/25/2002
15527<i> But having simple theft be nothing in one case and in another with simLane3-6/25/2002
15526OK. But this is still a problem: <i>Single offenders are penalized by loLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15525You are ignoring the fact that this great latitude in sentencing was taking awayLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15524<i>allow murderers to walk free if their "panel" so decides. <Lane3-6/25/2002
15523If its not a problem to do things that way they should have done them that way fTimF-6/25/2002
15522I hope nobody owned any WCOM: Message 17652443Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15521<i>evidence that would give away vital inteligence sources or techniques iLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15520<i> I don't think he should be released either. </i> I think TimF-6/25/2002
15519We shall have to initiate a Rambi search again. She's been missing since thLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15518Much of one's attitude about such things is a function of confidence and truLane3-6/25/2002
15517Laz, in all these systems we have two choices. We can treat everyone the same aLane3-6/25/2002
15516Isn't the system you propose rather similar to the position of the POTUS visLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15515<i> Guessing about what other people are likely to do is a fool's erraLane3-6/25/2002
15514Great! So we'll set up a system where some group of your "friends and Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15513<i>What safe gaurds would you build against premature releases?</i> Lane3-6/25/2002
15512<i>We would learn how to determine when people should be allowed back intoLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15511<i>Huh?</i> Message 17651232Lane3-6/25/2002
15510Huh?Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15509<i>"But I think it is better that she stay there until the officials one_less-6/25/2002
15508<i>That's what worries me. </i> I understand that. But arbitraLane3-6/25/2002
15507Spoken like a union shop steward... <g>Lane3-6/25/2002
15506<I>So far, I can see no reason to throw out baby or bathwater. Maybe tomorLane3-6/25/2002
15505<i>We were talking, I thought, about the difference between a regular systLane3-6/25/2002
15504<i>there's some thought going into determining when she goes back intoLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15503Oh. OK. :-) Then we'll just Dr. Frankenstein, bring the victim back to lLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15502The great variability and unfairness of the results of the sort of system you deLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15501<i>Psychological evaluations are notoriously unreliable. </i> I knowLane3-6/25/2002
15500<i>"But let's deal with the case I had in mind: the battered wifeaverage joe-6/25/2002
15499<i>"I submit that that's only because you didn't grow up withaverage joe-6/25/2002
15498So far, I can see no reason to throw out baby or bathwater. Maybe tomorrow. I shNeocon-6/25/2002
15497We were talking, I thought, about the difference between a regular system and onNeocon-6/25/2002
15496<i>Otherwise she stays in the facility being evaluated and rehabilitated Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15495EDITLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15494<i>If your beef is with the economics of the situation</i> My beef Lane3-6/25/2002
15493<i>I can see no advantage</i> None? Not even a little one? What aLane3-6/25/2002
15492If your beef is with the economics of the situation, fine, make convicts productNeocon-6/25/2002
15491<i>And when it is determined that, for most criminals, there are no physicLane3-6/25/2002
15490<i>And when it is determined that, for most criminals, there are no physicLane3-6/25/2002
15489<i>Now what's the punishment under your scheme? </i> There is nLane3-6/25/2002
15488We're in trouble.Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15487You miss something here: MOST CRIMINALS ARE NOT KNOWN TO MOST PEOPLE. Most areLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15486<i> What is wrong with that?</i> There's no reason why isolatioLane3-6/25/2002
15485I can see no advantage, unless I had greater faith in the probity of the personsNeocon-6/25/2002
15484And when it is determined that, for most criminals, there are no physical causesLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15483<i>Because you can't guarantee any of that?</i> I can't guaLane3-6/25/2002
15482<i>Now, what happens if rough equality of sentencing flies out the window,Lane3-6/25/2002
15481And she says "PISS ON THIS!", boards a flight to Brazil, and that'Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15480<i>You assume there are physical causes of criminality. </i> I don&Lane3-6/25/2002
15479All she has to do is move, and all of that stigma disappears. Let her go to a shNeocon-6/25/2002
15478<i>There is a deterrent effect to be achieved. Not on her. On the next angLane3-6/25/2002
15477<i>Why does the price have to include removal from society for a spell? WhLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15476True, technical fairness is not necessarily fair. But look at some of the nonsenNeocon-6/25/2002
15475You assume there <i>are</i> physical causes of criminality. This heLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15474How does the victim participate if the victim is dead? And what reparations doeLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15473<i>But we cannot let her off the hook too easily about what she did.</iLane3-6/25/2002
15472<i>We cannot afford a system of justice that can be accused of being too aLane3-6/25/2002
15471<b>?????????????????</b> Oh, come now, Karen. You're talking &Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15470The point is that it doesn't matter if she is a danger to anyone. Yes, we maNeocon-6/25/2002
15469You can run her out of your bridge club if you want. Some other bridge club migLane3-6/25/2002
15468<i>Yes. I suppose a healthy young male or female could have their time redLane3-6/25/2002
15467We cannot afford a system of justice that can be accused of being too arbitrary.Neocon-6/25/2002
15466<i>You wait until their bodies are worn out and useless?</i> It doeLane3-6/25/2002
15465<i>Or the ban on cruel and unusual punishment goes.</i> My scheme hLane3-6/25/2002
15464Yes, murder is reason to run her out of the bridge club, regardless of whether oNeocon-6/25/2002
15463<i>But how do you assure that? </i> You can't, of course. OTOHLane3-6/25/2002
15462<i>"I was not force feeding him selenium. I was putting it in milk alaverage joe-6/25/2002
15461Or years ahead, anyway. A "pacifist male" is a contradiction in termsLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15460LOL. That cartoon is right on target. The bureaucrats will be so consumed abouLane3-6/25/2002
15459And whatever efficiency they now have will be erased by the constant turmoil ofLane3-6/25/2002
15458Your namesake was light years ahead of Niven. geocities.comaverage joe-6/25/2002
15457<i>You can't force feed him selenium </i> I was not force feediLane3-6/25/2002
15456What? You wait until their bodies are worn out and useless? What's the poiLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15455<i> I see no reason to accommodate the blood lust of some elements of sociLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15454<i>Single offenders are penalized by loss of reputation and general socialLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15453<i>That's EXACTLY what happens in his Known Space series.</i> NLane3-6/25/2002
15452The Week in Review had an article on said department, nytimes.com , which contaWin Smith-6/25/2002
15451I think the squirreliest part is that it can function at all as designed. Tee bLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15450<i>That would be in the boilerplate.</i> The criminal is a human beaverage joe-6/25/2002
15449But that is why I construe punishment within a framework of penance. The idea isNeocon-6/25/2002
15448LOL!!! HAVE YOU BEEN READING NIVEN??? That's EXACTLY what happens in his Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15447I am reading all of your relevant posts. Good start and kudos for being on the rone_less-6/25/2002
15446Sleep eating's dangerous By Steve Infanti SCRIPPS HOWARD NEWS SERVICE Q: Lane3-6/25/2002
15445I agree with every word of that post. Yet, even when we are on the same page I fone_less-6/25/2002
15444Sorry, just confirming, since you "did not know how you knew". Poorly Neocon-6/25/2002
15443Yes. That's what I said: she isn't alive and he is.Constant Reader-6/25/2002
15442<i>ditto...</i> Well, you two may not be persuading each other, butLane3-6/25/2002
15441<i>In this instance, where you have found it "content-free"--it Lazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15440OTOH, all that equipment, time, thought, money and study could go into finding cLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15439There are lots of apparently squirrelly elements of this proposed new departmentLane3-6/25/2002
15438No it isn't. The executee doesn't get a weapon. A stupid comment deserLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15437<i>According to the article, the administration's proposed legislationLazarus_Long-6/25/2002
15436It is very simple. We teach how to regard acts by our responses. Through punishmNeocon-6/25/2002
15435<i>"I am sorry if it not persuasive to you."</i> ditto...one_less-6/25/2002
15434That is where we break down in agreement. To say that there are a variety of conNeocon-6/25/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):