SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
15933Yup. Let's give them a fair trial and then hang them. :-)Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15932Agreed. If the idiots on the 9th Circuits weren't idiots, they would have rLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15931First, citizens are not REQUIRED to say the pledge. Second, I think the pledge Michael M-6/28/2002
15930Good. I'm glad yu finally accepted that GWB won the election :-) <i&gLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15929Some Americans don't believe in God. I don't believe in affirmative actijlallen-6/28/2002
15928Those who premeditate a murder should "fry" (after legally being convijlallen-6/28/2002
15927<i>When I was young, imprisonment was supposed to be about rehabilitation.Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15926Nope. That would be like trying to get Ted Kennedy to lay off the Chivas and yojlallen-6/28/2002
15925<i>So I am hoping this to mean that if someone passed a law that says you Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15924<i>Feelings are running high on this.</i> Neither Government nor anDayuhan-6/28/2002
15923I see no reason to suspect the answer would be any different regardless of what Michael M-6/28/2002
15922Political suicide. It would please no one (except maybe a couple of people on SMichael M-6/28/2002
15921The Pledge doesn't include the words "BUY GENERAL MOTORS AUTOMOBILES!&qLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15920<i>"Whether any individual decides to believe what those humans say ione_less-6/28/2002
15919<i>It is interesting that we become so arrogant as to require something &qDayuhan-6/28/2002
15918No such thing as a mistake-free war. The number of "accidental" casuaMichael M-6/28/2002
15917I defer to the analysts on that one...no clue.one_less-6/28/2002
15916Do you think they'd be interested in statesmanship or prefer the political aLane3-6/28/2002
15915Oh, sorry. I'm going out briefly for a little while and had a few mins beforE-6/28/2002
15914Could you forward that to the W. House?one_less-6/28/2002
15913There is a wonderful opportunity in this. All we would need to fix it would be Lane3-6/28/2002
15912<i>"should the Government require a citizen to declare faith in a Godone_less-6/28/2002
15911Regardless of the qualifications of the pilots, it is disturbing, and not only bDayuhan-6/28/2002
15910The problem here stems from the phrase "in line with", which is open tDayuhan-6/28/2002
15909okone_less-6/28/2002
15908<i>I objected to Laz's statement that the Government can not be in linLane3-6/28/2002
15907I did not say that the government makes anti-God rhetoric. I was objecting to Laone_less-6/28/2002
15906<i>"The government can support the principles of charity, mercy, and one_less-6/28/2002
15905Jewel, would you show me any anti-God rhetoric indulged in by the government? E-6/28/2002
15904Guard and Reserve flyers have long been used in active missions. Regardless of Michael M-6/28/2002
15903I agree with you entirely. I'd be surprised if a good proportion of the hatLane3-6/28/2002
15902OK. You got one I can use? :-) I think the idiot has set off a totally unneceLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15901<i>And the jerk who started this should be stripped of citizenship and depLane3-6/28/2002
15900Perhaps there aren't enough of them to actually roar?Michael M-6/28/2002
15899Laz, you seem determined to put words in my mouth. If you will be so kind to teMichael M-6/28/2002
15898<i>I do not find anything in the Constitution of the United States to be oLane3-6/28/2002
15897<i> Its the government has to be anti-God rhetoric that does it. </i&gDayuhan-6/28/2002
15896A good compromise. And this will take compromise. Lots of entrenched conflicLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15895<<If you had that part of your life to do over, knowing what you know now,Ish-6/28/2002
15894It seems that the "friendly" fire that killed four Canadian soldiers iDayuhan-6/28/2002
15893<i>"That's a reach. Those principles can exist independent of youone_less-6/28/2002
15892<i>"You suggest that by denying God, Laz and I risk undermining the sone_less-6/28/2002
15891<i> According to your statement the government should not support the prinLane3-6/28/2002
15890<i>"This would likely ignite fear of Big Brother."</i> Suone_less-6/28/2002
15889Good idea. Cell phones don't have sufficient bandwidth to transmit images iLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15888Lets trace this logic for a sec. You said: <i>"Then perhaps they areone_less-6/28/2002
15887<i>Since when? </i> Since the 1st Congress passed this: <i><Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15886<i>Legally, there's a good argument the decision was right. PoliticallLane3-6/28/2002
15885What a dip you are... Time for Laz to ban your nonsense from this thread...jlallen-6/28/2002
15884Threat? What threat? Because someone is challenging your beliefs? That'Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15883I've been reading quite a bit about ceremonial deism in the last day. I musLane3-6/28/2002
15882<i>I ran hard in my youth</i> If you had that part of your life to Lane3-6/28/2002
15881<i><i>and, finally, the voucher decision by the Supremes yesterday mLane3-6/28/2002
15880I ran hard in my youth. Took some colorful guys to keep up with me.Ish-6/28/2002
158791. Active response is useful in dealing with any old threat, Laz. 2. "DoMichael M-6/28/2002
15878You sure have some colorful friends. I don't think all the friends I'veLane3-6/28/2002
15877Let me stick in a somewhat OT thing here. I had a friend and neighbor who did thIsh-6/28/2002
15876One vote for rehabilitation. Check.Lane3-6/28/2002
15875<i>So what do you think about parole for Leslie Van Houten? Being weak-wiLane3-6/28/2002
15874From what I've heard I don't see any problem cutting her loose. I would Ish-6/28/2002
15873<i> If we sustain the idea of responsibility, then there is guilt, and it Lane3-6/28/2002
15872<i> "solution" that eliminates the appeals process </i> GoLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15871I have been busy with preparing for the move, and getting some stuff done for myNeocon-6/28/2002
15870Reviewing the particulars, as given in the MSNBC story, I would be ambivalent. HNeocon-6/28/2002
15869Not if you are going to keep alive the idea of responsibility, that we should diNeocon-6/28/2002
15868The Labour Party was not happy at the prospect of partition, which, if you have Neocon-6/28/2002
15867<i>OK, Grumpy</i> When I saw that, I was SURE the post was directed Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15866Good article. "Ceremonial deism" - I like that.Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15865OK, Grumpy, so you don't think it's even theoretically possible to set uLane3-6/28/2002
15864<i> I believe active response is useful.</i> Such as? To what? <Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15863Ah, but you have made an argument. You've resorted to the "You disagreMichael M-6/28/2002
15862I gave you thoughtful feedback. You didn't like it. C'est la vie.....Neocon-6/28/2002
15861The nice woman who shot her son- in- law is not likely to be put in a maximum seNeocon-6/28/2002
15860You're not reading the mail very carefully, Laz. My "not by sitting...Michael M-6/28/2002
15859<i>(1) Because the USSC says lethal injection is not torture? That's aOriginal Mad Dog-6/28/2002
15858Pledging Allegiance: Wrong for the Right Reasons By E. J. Dionne Jr. Friday, JLane3-6/28/2002
15857<i>"Then perhaps they are in the wrong country. The gov'ts withinone_less-6/28/2002
15856I don't think photo IDs do anything to deter terrorists. They can be easily one_less-6/28/2002
15855ROTFLMAO!!!! I've never made that mistake. Have I missed anything? :-)Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15854OK. Misunderstanding. Profiling generally seems to be the hot button issue. Lazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15853<i>However another argument about losing the country has to do with founLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15852That is not my case? I have no problem with profiling. <i>"Thereone_less-6/28/2002
15851<i>"However, this same type of argument was used to keep women from cone_less-6/28/2002
15850If you can demonstrate that the Muslim woman is being pulled over simply becauseLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15849I think the issue is ID. I pondered the safety question a bit and I don't tLane3-6/28/2002
15848We also agree on that...:-)Solon-6/28/2002
15847"...the ironies and paradoxes of life are unending</i>" LOL! OSolon-6/28/2002
15846<i>...peope are always taking home somebody else's wife by mistake.&qone_less-6/28/2002
15845<i>"...is not the exhibition rather an act of vanity?"</i>one_less-6/28/2002
15844<i>This completely wrecks any deterrence aspect since it promotes the ideaLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15843<i>"This is not a absolute religious requirement but a cultural adaptone_less-6/28/2002
15842<i>Though I don't see why killing somebody is more acceptable than torLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15841<i>"We're going to lose the country because of two words in the pone_less-6/28/2002
15840seattletimes.nwsource.com It is good of you to point out that wearing the veil Solon-6/28/2002
15839<i>On the other hand this has little to do with the logic underlying the iLane3-6/28/2002
15838We're going to lose the country because of two words in the pledge? A bit oLazarus_Long-6/28/2002
15837aah. I see your point.one_less-6/28/2002
15836<i>This is not unusual at all. </i> I know. But what with that bacLane3-6/28/2002
15835<i>"I'm wondering now if she isn't a bit of an instigator likone_less-6/28/2002
15834You're a wise man.Poet-6/28/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):