SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?
An SI Board Since February 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
20039 79 0
Emcee:  Don Earl Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16073<i>You'd need to secretly plant them on dozens of columns on dozens ofTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16072From this construction photo you can see just how thin the floor pan was. Of cTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16071Whoa there partner. You've jumped way ahead of the investigation with all ofOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16070Have you seen this? scholarsfor911truth.orgOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16069Sure, more analysis would be nice. The problem is that most people think that tDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16068<<< Would we not expect in a gravity only collapse that the upper floorDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16067I don't care about the 97 floors below and how they were crushed. I want to Orcastraiter-9/20/2006
16066<i>I spent a month on this site thinking that you were making some sense, Orcastraiter-9/20/2006
16065Your test is fine except that you forgot that there were 97 more floors than thDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16064<<< Jones found the signature of thermite on steel from the WTC. >&David Howe-9/20/2006
16063I propose that a simple test be conducted. First we all agree that the building Orcastraiter-9/20/2006
16062<i>I'll sooner believe that little green men really do live on Mars beOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16061Thermite. Here's a link to the best video I could find of a thermite reactiDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16060<b>Calling it the way it truly is!</b> The lady who wrote this lettatm_prophet-9/20/2006
16059You're asking a wingnut about <i>thinking</i>??? They're noDoug R-9/20/2006
16058<<< When the truss sagged it no longer acted as a brace for the side waDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16057<i>I don't know why you don't see pieces of the deck in the photosOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16056<i>you're not keeping up with the story. </i> You are taking faTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16055<i>the joists pulled away from the core columns and started the collapse.&TigerPaw-9/20/2006
16054<i> That means temperatures in excess of 2800 F.</i> No, it doesn&#TigerPaw-9/20/2006
16053I already showed you the construction of the floors and yet you just refuse to lTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16052<i>What caused temperatures in excess of 2800 F? </i> Another red hTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16051<i>NIST says the floors did not fail.</i> It's obvious the floorTigerPaw-9/19/2006
16050<i>Apparently some don't see it that way ... </i> Way back in tTigerPaw-9/19/2006
16049<i>Tests show that 2 hours at 1500 degrees wouldn't cause collapse. &lTigerPaw-9/19/2006
16048<i>Exactly. </i> Perhaps you didn't notice. He could do the enTigerPaw-9/19/2006
16047<<< How thick are those pans? 20ga? they were corrugated. How come I doDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16046We both agree they were poured on pan type steel decks, as you call them. How Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16045I think it does matter. If it was normal concrete reinforced with #3 bars 16&quoOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16044<i>Not sure yet, that's an open question in my mind. I did see a pictuOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16043The point is...first these guys said the floors failed. We all saw the cartoon oOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16042<<< You don't know anything about the floors on the WTC >>>David Howe-9/19/2006
16041<<< You can see the dust coming out of the building way ahead of the coDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16040<<< "NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16039I think that you are making statements outside your area of expertise then. You Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16038Whatever dude...I won't even get into such a nit picking argument with you. Doug R-9/19/2006
16037You can see the dust coming out of the building way ahead of the collapse zone iOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16036<<< <i>You're not in construction or building design are you&David Howe-9/19/2006
16035<<< We're seeing dust coming from the building in the early part ofDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16034"NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News