SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?
An SI Board Since February 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
20039 79 0
Emcee:  Don Earl Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16090<<< Do you have a link to Jones' statement in that regard? >>David Howe-9/21/2006
16089v911t.orgProud Deplorable-9/21/2006
16088<<< When you look at the video watch closely. One second the steel is tDavid Howe-9/21/2006
16087Popular Mechanics Story Debunked on the Air in Arizona for All to Hear. v911t.orProud Deplorable-9/21/2006
16086Not maintaining anything Tiger. All I'm saying is remnant of a smoking corneOrcastraiter-9/21/2006
16085<i>Nope that looks like a blown core to me.</i> Is there anything tTigerPaw-9/21/2006
16084It does not refute that possibility. Having only one corner of the core steel leOrcastraiter-9/21/2006
16083<i>What is interesting about the steel that is left standing momentarily aTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16082You mentioned: "This should prove that they provide minimal upwards supportOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16081<i>No, it should be explored and explained</i> I agree 100%.Orcastraiter-9/20/2006
16080When you look at the video watch closely. One second the steel is there and the Orcastraiter-9/20/2006
16079<<< The buildings collapsed at free fall speed. That's a notable piDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16078What is interesting about the steel that is left standing momentarily after the David Howe-9/20/2006
16077<i>Remember the upper floors were not crushed by 97 floors. They rode the TigerPaw-9/20/2006
16076<i>who says that the pan deck metal was vaporised. You just don't see TigerPaw-9/20/2006
16075<i>First we all agree that the building fell in 9-10 seconds. </i> NTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16074<i>Jones found the signature of thermite on steel from the WTC. </i>TigerPaw-9/20/2006
16073<i>You'd need to secretly plant them on dozens of columns on dozens ofTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16072From this construction photo you can see just how thin the floor pan was. Of cTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16071Whoa there partner. You've jumped way ahead of the investigation with all ofOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16070Have you seen this? scholarsfor911truth.orgOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16069Sure, more analysis would be nice. The problem is that most people think that tDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16068<<< Would we not expect in a gravity only collapse that the upper floorDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16067I don't care about the 97 floors below and how they were crushed. I want to Orcastraiter-9/20/2006
16066<i>I spent a month on this site thinking that you were making some sense, Orcastraiter-9/20/2006
16065Your test is fine except that you forgot that there were 97 more floors than thDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16064<<< Jones found the signature of thermite on steel from the WTC. >&David Howe-9/20/2006
16063I propose that a simple test be conducted. First we all agree that the building Orcastraiter-9/20/2006
16062<i>I'll sooner believe that little green men really do live on Mars beOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16061Thermite. Here's a link to the best video I could find of a thermite reactiDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16060<b>Calling it the way it truly is!</b> The lady who wrote this lettatm_prophet-9/20/2006
16059You're asking a wingnut about <i>thinking</i>??? They're noDoug R-9/20/2006
16058<<< When the truss sagged it no longer acted as a brace for the side waDavid Howe-9/20/2006
16057<i>I don't know why you don't see pieces of the deck in the photosOrcastraiter-9/20/2006
16056<i>you're not keeping up with the story. </i> You are taking faTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16055<i>the joists pulled away from the core columns and started the collapse.&TigerPaw-9/20/2006
16054<i> That means temperatures in excess of 2800 F.</i> No, it doesn&#TigerPaw-9/20/2006
16053I already showed you the construction of the floors and yet you just refuse to lTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16052<i>What caused temperatures in excess of 2800 F? </i> Another red hTigerPaw-9/20/2006
16051<i>NIST says the floors did not fail.</i> It's obvious the floorTigerPaw-9/19/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News