SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17033<i>It will be interesting to find out what they gained by doing wash salesDayuhan-7/8/2002
17032I have little trust for statistics based purely on diet. There are too many othDayuhan-7/8/2002
17031Low fat does not mean low calories.Which is important if you are to lose weight.alexed-7/8/2002
17030I have come to the conclusion that the definition of who is what depends on the Constant Reader-7/8/2002
17029Natural or steroids?Looks like either is not a great choice.I will look this artalexed-7/8/2002
17028That is hardly an argument in favor of the status quo, I think.Constant Reader-7/8/2002
17027LOL,no I am not talking a frog,lol.Your husband knows.I have fished for them froalexed-7/8/2002
17026A few days ago I was in a little OT spat on a kayaking message board that I freqDayuhan-7/8/2002
17025<i>"Hemmingway did a book on it and they made a movie from the book.&Solon-7/8/2002
17024There's been a lot of chatter in the mainstream press for a good five years Lane3-7/8/2002
17023<i> The problem then becomes artificial inflation of the number of handicaLane3-7/8/2002
17022<i> My point to Laz about cherry picking by private schools was that thereTimF-7/8/2002
17021<<It reminds all of us, though, of an old Donne poem...>> You mean Ish-7/8/2002
17020<i> Some experimentation with vouchers and charter schools is great, not nTimF-7/8/2002
17019Thanks, Ish. Leaving aside comic relief--it is very serious, and I would never Solon-7/8/2002
17018<i> THREAD: It's safe to come out now. I'm done with the vouchers TimF-7/8/2002
17017July 8, 2002 <b>From Justice Scalia, a Chilling Vision of Religion’s AuthE-7/8/2002
17016Oops. I just posted this: I'll betcha that WSJ article wouldn't have beE-7/8/2002
17015<i>Perhaps the biggest worry associated with obesity is the concurrent surE-7/8/2002
17014There really isn't new information in that article. I've just never seLane3-7/8/2002
17013This article on a similar subject appeared in the Wall Street Journal last week Constant Reader-7/8/2002
17012Oh, yes, another thing interesting in that article is the information that the wE-7/8/2002
17011Roll, shit run.Ish-7/8/2002
17010Keep saying <i>SMOOCH</i> as you roll?E-7/8/2002
17009It's been a big mistake for everyone to believe that there was scientific evE-7/8/2002
17008Well, if I wanted to lose weight and thought the diet might work, I would chooseMichael M-7/8/2002
17007<i>I was surprised that about the lack of statistical evidence to prove anE-7/8/2002
17006<i>At least it would be definitive for that individual. </i> For thLane3-7/8/2002
17005I would consider it definitive if a person went on a diet and it worked. At leaMichael M-7/8/2002
17004<<To show intended great levity, roll around the floor laughing your ass oIsh-7/8/2002
17003<<(My husband just came in and said he used to catch them in Maryland.... Ish-7/8/2002
17002You need to get over this steroid thing. Farmers are working to get a healthier Ish-7/8/2002
17001After everything you say to your wife, say 'g,' or 's'. Or make E-7/8/2002
17000<i>I didn't see <s> (seriously) at the end.</i> That'E-7/8/2002
16999Just don't let it happen again. Our patience is not unlimited. Thank you.E-7/8/2002
16998LOL! Why not, you base your political views on not a single fact....!!!!jlallen-7/8/2002
16997<I>My wife just assured me that I am not that man</I> LOL!Poet-7/8/2002
16996Hey there Alexed, Croaker. You're not talking frog, are you? That's a Poet-7/8/2002
16995<i>That article is amazing. And fascinating. So it's all been a big miTigerPaw-7/8/2002
16994An example of the dishonesty of the website US-Israel.org: It says "The EcThomas M.-7/8/2002
16993That may be true.Farm animals and even fish are feed steroids,slaughtered and thalexed-7/8/2002
16992"mistakes were made " - Ronald Reagan <i>For 18 months now, weTigerPaw-7/8/2002
16991<i>Some never get it right</i> LOLOLOLOL!! Posted by the living emjlallen-7/8/2002
16990Some never get it right. autism.netTigerPaw-7/8/2002
16989You might want to stay away from that website if you want anyone to take you serThomas M.-7/8/2002
16988<<I'm not convinced that the author isn't actually a paid consultaIsh-7/8/2002
16987hahahahahahahajlallen-7/8/2002
16986It's a very long article to say, basically, that they don't know. I thiLane3-7/8/2002
16985Hello Poet, Have you ever eaten croaker?Very tasty. As far as the accounting ealexed-7/8/2002
16984Time to run. Take care, all....Neocon-7/8/2002
16983I don't know, and it appears they don't either. I'm not convinced thConstant Reader-7/8/2002
16982<<What???? Atkin's right after all????>> My neighbor lost over Ish-7/8/2002
16981I just remembered that I do sometimes put 'lol.' Usually when I've aE-7/8/2002
16980That article is amazing. And fascinating. So it's all been a big mistake, eaE-7/8/2002
16979<<On behalf of all Canadians, I wish to extend my deepest apologies for alIsh-7/8/2002
16978Arab Leaders Provoke Exodus A plethora of evidence exists demonstrating that PalNeocon-7/8/2002
16977Actually, I think most of them are pretty smart. I count on it......Neocon-7/8/2002
16976<i>When the Arab League rejected the partition, advised the native Arab pThomas M.-7/8/2002
16975alcohol or ether? :-)Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16974The restaurant had a lot of different sushi rolls with weird names that I had noLane3-7/8/2002
16973<i>"You're unusually unirascible</i>" I thought I <Solon-7/8/2002
16972<i> I want to meet the man who ever gets it right.</i> My wife just Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16971You feeling OK? You're unusually unirascible. :-) Are they putting drugs Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16970<i>"And still we often get it wrong."</i> Often? Who ofteone_less-7/8/2002
16969What???? Atkin's right after all???? I only read part of it. It's lonLazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16968Both Canadians and Americans have been fortunate. Differences of opinion and Solon-7/8/2002
16967Back when market manipulation was legal, wash sales were a common part of an effLazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16966<i>"well, how likely is it, Laz, that I would be saying seriously thaone_less-7/8/2002
16965"Mr. Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" Certainly has a better ring thaLazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16964LOL! Oh Solon, your apology has brightened my day. Please acknowledge my renewPoet-7/8/2002
16963Yes, it's those durn Canadians. -g Seriously though, we're a little itPoet-7/8/2002
16962I miss his speeches. He was an artless person who did not need to fake what he Solon-7/8/2002
16961Try it, you'll like it.....Neocon-7/8/2002
16960<i>A short metaphysical disquisition for Karen</i> Uh, huh.Lane3-7/8/2002
16959LOL!Solon-7/8/2002
16958LOL!!! You're dead! Just dead! :-) Or, as The Gipper would have put it,Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16957On behalf of all Americans... SMOKE THIS! -g-Bill-7/8/2002
16956On the net, yes. Even with emoticons, what can be portrayed is limited. And moLazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16955On behalf of all Canadians, I wish to extend my deepest apologies for allowing tSolon-7/8/2002
16954A short metaphysical disquisition for Karen: There is both order and disorder iNeocon-7/8/2002
16953Since people seem to be changing their mind daily about who is or is not smart, Constant Reader-7/8/2002
16952There was an interesting article on the subject of fat=bad and carbohydrates=gooConstant Reader-7/8/2002
16951All right. So I'm humor challenged. Why are you picking on us alternativelLazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16950Yep, that's right.Ish-7/8/2002
16949I hate laugh tracks. Here's my compromise: I'll add a g It won't E-7/8/2002
16948You should've been on CNBC.E-7/8/2002
16947They use canned laughter in TV. If it's good enough for the professionals, Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16946If they inflated both revenues and expenses by the same dollar amount, wouldnBill-7/8/2002
16945Some people don't look both ways when the cross the street and make it to thE-7/8/2002
16944Presumably, whatever can be gained in the market by creating the impression of iE-7/8/2002
16943Two wolves fighting over the spoils.Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16942Statistically, though......Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16941I refuse. Unless there's no other way. I can't explain it.E-7/8/2002
16940Message 17702447 smarter Here's what you contrast them with: Member 4761980Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16939It will be interesting to find out what they gained by doing wash sales.Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16938Local reports here blame the haze on Quebec fires.Lane3-7/8/2002
16937And two of the four benefit-management companies that manage these accounts do iE-7/8/2002
16936Good. I was about to call the paramedics to have you treated for braincramp. Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16935Message 17706042Lazarus_Long-7/8/2002
16934This guy says what they did did not affect profits- -revenues andd expenses wereLazarus_Long-7/8/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News