SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
USRX
An SI Board Since November 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
18024 14 0
Emcee:  damniseedemons Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17499 To all: MR. PINK TRIED TO WARN YOU THAT USRX WAS A SUCKERS PLAY. TOO BAD. MRMr. Pink-4/21/1997
17498 Down 3 3/8 to 47 3/8 at 10:15Am EST. Could it be that USRX did not meet whispChris Vu-4/21/1997
17497 NOTim Luke-4/21/1997
17496 Glenn- It may be old news but is is clearly killing the stock today. Thanks tFinder-4/21/1997
17495 <i>I've missed a few posts here and there. Has anyone reported an actGlenn D. Rudolph-4/21/1997
17494 Thanks, Moonray. I've been following that. It may actually be a slightly loDavid Lawrence-4/21/1997
17493 David, I am tracking all the posts. No active connection. See: techstocks.coMoonray-4/21/1997
17492 Glenn, I've missed a few posts here and there. Has anyone reported an actiDavid Lawrence-4/21/1997
17491 GlobalCenter shields customers from 56K controversy; First business Internet maGlenn D. Rudolph-4/21/1997
17490 Check this out us.pc.ibm.com Seems IBM has an IBM "branded" X2. LiDon Edgerton-4/21/1997
17489 Media bias vs. media ignorance: Glenn wrote, "<i>I believe someone Dick Smith-4/21/1997
17488 Derek, I agree that the INTC "news" is not a surprise. In addition, Glenn D. Rudolph-4/20/1997
17487 Glenn, the INTC news is really not a surprise, but the street may have short medrmorgan-4/20/1997
17486 To all: I believe someone at Reuters is a short seller in either COMS or USRX Glenn D. Rudolph-4/20/1997
17485 Glenn: Thank you for the USR response, and the Intel/CSCO post.I am an "iJohn Meares-4/20/1997
17484 I believe the Reuters story was old news again. Look at this old press release Glenn D. Rudolph-4/20/1997
17483 If 3COM wants to stay alive they better come out with some new upgraded technolthomas hayden-4/20/1997
17482 <i>O well I didnt want to retire early anyway (did I?) it makes life too Glenn D. Rudolph-4/20/1997
17481 Hi Glenn: <i>I am going to stay with USRX. However, I never wanted anythifreeus-4/20/1997
17480 Intel to launch aggressive network products Reuters Story - April 20, 1997 14Glenn D. Rudolph-4/20/1997
17479 <i>I am bewildered what ever made USR feel it needed to merge with 3COM? Glenn D. Rudolph-4/20/1997
17478 Glenn: Thank you for your response. We agree on COMS - I am also heavy into UJohn Meares-4/19/1997
17477 <i>Please educate me, 1. What does this mean for the USRX price? </i&gGlenn D. Rudolph-4/19/1997
17476 Glenn: Please educate me, 1. What does this mean for the USRX price? 2. WhJohn Meares-4/19/1997
17475 3COM lower ... The market has already factored in the fact that 3COM sales shouFrank DiLorenzo-4/18/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):