SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega - A Civil Discussion
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1908 3 0 IOM
Emcee:  Trakker Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1783 there was also a 3:2 or 5:4 (can't find my statements) in November, 94.Trakker-6/30/1997
1782 Hope IOM doesn't do a reverse split. The only stocks I've owned that diFrank Drumond-6/29/1997
1781 BLSI did a 10:1 reverse split this month, went from around 1/2 to 5. And I donFuzzFace-6/29/1997
1780 Reverse stock split? Yes it is possible. SYQT thread had talked about a 1:10 steve goff-6/29/1997
1779 The second split was one of three major Iomega mistakes. The others were the ofFrancis Muir-6/29/1997
1778 JetsonB- Yes, that's right. Two splits, totalling 6 for 1. I'm just Cogito-6/29/1997
1777 How many times has Iomega stock split since '95? Has there been two splits:JetsonB-6/29/1997
1776 Re: SYQT / China / IOM -- Post #1732 started a nice little exchange on the ajwk-6/28/1997
1775 Re: short influence Allen sez: "There is quite a bit of money at stake onEve Edelson-6/24/1997
1774 >>what do you think of the Forbes article which came out yesterday over tCogito-6/24/1997
1773 Todd, you're absolutely right. And if anyone doubts it, take at look at thKM-6/24/1997
1772 RE: Civility and the need for a thread Allen, I think your spot on. But, earnTrakker-6/24/1997
1771 so, Allen, love to here your take on IOM's action today, i've tended toD.J.Smyth-6/24/1997
1770 All - I think perhaps the problem with this thread is that the main one has beCogito-6/24/1997
1769 << Short Interest Analysis >> great. Thanks. FIDOFrancis Muir-6/20/1997
1768 RE: Short Interest Analysis For anyone interested, I put an analysis of the shMichael Coley-6/20/1997
1767 << What happened o' wise one? >> Sorry, old chap, I don't Francis Muir-6/20/1997
1766 Francis: Remember this: techstocks.com Your reply was: techstocks.com WhatMichael Rick-6/20/1997
1765 << Allen, the Shark is considerably smaller and lighter than Zip or Jaz dFrancis Muir-6/20/1997
1764 >>Allen, the Shark is considerably smaller and lighter than Zip or Jaz drCogito-6/20/1997
1763 >>>>>>>>>BTW, as for the laptop market, the Avatar aHardMoney-6/20/1997
1762 Allen, the Shark is considerably smaller and lighter than Zip or Jaz drives. I Jon Tara-6/19/1997
1761 >>Iomega doesn't plan to introduce a PC card version, which will makeCogito-6/19/1997
1760 >>Does anyone else think that Shark is in a position to kill Zip and possCogito-6/19/1997
1759 RE: Avatar Shark I think that one important question has not been addressed yeJohn P. Henrie-6/19/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News