SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
OAKLEY- NYSE:OO
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1383 7 0 OO
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
183 Brian, thanks for being another voice of reason. You articulated our points inalan zee-2/27/1997
182 Is anyone starting to get the feeling that this so called product release of X-IN_GOD_I_TRUST-2/26/1997
181 James, Why would Lynch use TA, he doesn't need to. Read up on him, you kBrian C. Lund-2/26/1997
180 Peter Lynch says TA is bunk. Tell you what..pick ten stocks and tell me if theycapitalistbeatnik-2/26/1997
179 Maybe so, but I'll get 5 one baggers and limit any potential losses versus alan zee-2/26/1997
178 Really? So you wouldn't want to buy AMAT last year at 25 because it was hecapitalistbeatnik-2/25/1997
177 Alan - Reason I don't sell is I don't want to realize a loss! SimplySam-2/24/1997
176 "why even be here since you would know that the stock is already correctlyalan zee-2/24/1997
175 TA is based upon the flawed premise that stocks are fairly valued and move up acapitalistbeatnik-2/23/1997
174 Why would you go long on a stock (like OO) if you could sell, free up your capialan zee-2/22/1997
173 Some factors on the stock price(IMHO): 1. X-metals and new product lines- hoSam-2/21/1997
172 Brian..... I invest in stocks as well as trade them. It's that simple. ISam-2/21/1997
171 Let's try this again.....here's what you said. To: Sam Ro (115 ) FromBrian C. Lund-2/21/1997
170 I agree too that the bottom has been reached but what do you see as factors thagrogger-2/21/1997
169 Brian- I never said that T.A was not valid. If you are a "trader" iSam-2/21/1997
168 First of all...... Sam--While it is true that TA is more closely associated wiBrian C. Lund-2/20/1997
167 Specifically, what are the technical indicators indicating a bottom in this stoC.N.S.-2/19/1997
166 listen- you're probably right so don't post to me- post to him!adam segel-2/19/1997
165 B.C.L.- Technical analysis is a very short term picture of price action in a sSam-2/19/1997
164 The REAL question is....where is the great founder of this board? Let's reaBrian C. Lund-2/19/1997
163 i am long at 8 5/8 and hoping to see this industry regain steam hopefully moradam segel-2/19/1997
162 I agree with Jannard. Probably won't see OO prices this low again (hopefulSam-2/19/1997
161 Adam, If I may jump in. I say I agree with his decision to buy those shares, iGreg Ballinger-2/18/1997
160 do you agree with his decision? adamadam segel-2/18/1997
159 Guess someone is bullish on OO.... OAKLEY FOUNDER TO PURCHASE UP TO AN ADDITIOSam-2/18/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News