SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Biotech Stock Picking for Charity - 2006
An SI Board Since December 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
592 41 0
Emcee:  michael_f_murphy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
192theresa, you're no saint. OT: I've watched two college football games Doc Bones-1/5/2006
191John..sorry for taking this long with my spec's..here they are..I haven'zeta1961-1/5/2006
190Wow, thanks for doing all this. Between you and Filo, we're buff. :-)scaram(o)uche-1/5/2006
189manny - just caught your post .... Glad your in .... regards, JohnJohn McCarthy-1/5/2006
188Manny, I think you'd be using year ends close. I don't think seeing the rkrw-1/4/2006
187New addition - Prices Please note: I ain't the *official* scorekeeper so John McCarthy-1/4/2006
186Update 4 Yesterday I screwed up and left out a contestant. (And duly apologizedJohn McCarthy-1/4/2006
185Update 3 Yesterday I screwed up and left out a contestant. (And duly apologizedJohn McCarthy-1/4/2006
184Mr. McKnuckles, you are short-changing yourself (10% each to only 9 stocks). DoFiloF-1/4/2006
183Hi Tuck. Looks like you are at 105% or $105,000 for your picks. I like that apFiloF-1/4/2006
182Update 2 Yesterday I screwed up and left out a contestant. (And duly apologizedJohn McCarthy-1/4/2006
181Update 1 Yesterday I screwed up and left out a contestant. (And duly apologizedJohn McCarthy-1/4/2006
180No more short issue post...why not a good science lesson? msnbc.msn.com InteresArthur Radley-1/4/2006
179The ones that I recognize look good to me, and it's cool to see SNSS in the scaram(o)uche-1/4/2006
178I went dumpster diving to get my list of longs I made over last weekend. Check tmanny_velasco-1/4/2006
177<i>It would be interesting to see what would happen to a portfolio of highFiloF-1/4/2006
176WOW THIS BOARD IS HOT. The short rule seemed not clear to me on December 31st angeorgiabiotech-1/4/2006
175Gee, TD. For someone who does not give a whit, you sure are passionate about thFiloF-1/4/2006
174Robert...trust me on this one! There are major differences in the following wordArthur Radley-1/4/2006
173grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrroan............ :-)scaram(o)uche-1/4/2006
172Well, Rick, you're correct as usual. I looked at the rules in the link you The Dodgy Ticker-1/4/2006
171Well a random biotech portfolio presumably has a considerably worse than 1 in 38Biomaven-1/4/2006
170<i>all these companies put together...</i> But only Peter has a basnigel bates-1/4/2006
169Peter...as we have learned from Enron and Worldcom...a "good" accountaArthur Radley-1/4/2006
168As you know, this growing gap is always of interest in the BVF thread. Yup, notscaram(o)uche-1/4/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News