SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19633<I>Voting to end tonight at midnight Pacific time. </i> Er, what tiBill-8/22/2002
19632<i>I think I would refuse to answer. If it was a legal proceeding my lawyeLane3-8/22/2002
19631<font color=red> <b>THREAD:</b> A proposal on the floor. SeLazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19630<b>THREAD HYGIENE</b> I would like to have put to a vote by the thrjlallen-8/22/2002
19629I think I would refuse to answer. If it was a legal proceeding my lawyer wouldTimF-8/22/2002
19628WON-DER-FUL! Keep the cell phone turned off. There's a company called fax.cLazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19627i don't like flying them, but i do frequently enough... i love the effect tMulhollandDrive-8/22/2002
19626I love Southwest Airlines.Original Mad Dog-8/22/2002
19625siliconinvestor.com sw still givin' em hell.MulhollandDrive-8/22/2002
19624Just occurred to me: The Dems have the blacks and Jews. The Reps have the Old Lazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19623Where will it end... FEC Decision Could Jump-Start SMS Political Ads By BrianLane3-8/22/2002
19622<i>Keep it up, Jesse! You divide and we'll conquer! </i> Yeah, Lane3-8/22/2002
19621You Know You're A New Yorker When..... forums.nytimes.com@55.3CW2ahMNRJq^0@.Lazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19620The point of describing my experience was to point out that 1) irrelevant, persoLane3-8/22/2002
19619<i>Also influencing the outcome was a strong white turnout for Majette, &lLazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19618<i> I did not lie under oath. I didn't have any need to lie. I was a gTimF-8/22/2002
19617<i>People are entitled to expect privacy regarding their sex lives. When tLazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19616It is often less then obvious who is lying and in general people are not convictTimF-8/22/2002
19615I bet Bill really wishes he never signed the law that allows for such questions TimF-8/22/2002
19614But the matter was about harassment, not Clinton's sex life. Do you think Bill-8/22/2002
19613I've served on juries. There are two sides and they make different claims. TigerPaw-8/22/2002
19612No with pretty normal prosecutors. Lying under oath is normally taken very seriTimF-8/22/2002
19611Utter baloney. He was caught by a law he signed into existence. He exercised aljlallen-8/22/2002
19610<i>However, his prosecutors showed no more respect for the system and prinjlallen-8/22/2002
19609<i>Just maybe that oath means that he should have had a bit more respect fLane3-8/22/2002
19608I was responding to Steve Rogers....not you... JLAjlallen-8/22/2002
19607<i> It is simply amazing to me that years after it is quite apparent just Lane3-8/22/2002
19606I understand where you are coming from, though I don't recall your post on tOriginal Mad Dog-8/22/2002
19605<i>I supervise people in my work. If I harass them, my company had damn weLane3-8/22/2002
19604Thanks. It is simply amazing to me that years after it is quite apparent just wjlallen-8/22/2002
19603I absolutely disagree. I supervise people in my work. If I harass them, my comOriginal Mad Dog-8/22/2002
19602People are entitled to expect privacy regarding their sex lives. When that privLane3-8/22/2002
19601Nice summary jla. The thing that really was irksome to me was the persistent arOriginal Mad Dog-8/22/2002
19600I found this analysis of the McKinney contest interesting. Impact of McKinney LLane3-8/22/2002
19599My, my, my. I always wondered who was in that place. Lucky dog, you. I stayed atBill-8/22/2002
19598Is that you mad dog?TigerPaw-8/22/2002
19597Your analysis is faulty. Paula Jones brought a lawsuit. She is entitled to dojlallen-8/22/2002
19596We took the house between Nantucket Sound and the Edgartown GC. The only bad thZoltan!-8/22/2002
19595Invite posters to post three best weblogs or more, that have integrity and are utheeleventhmuse-8/22/2002
19594If he figures he can't get Congress' backing, he'd be crazy to go inLazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19593Do you need help finding your way back to the GWB thread?Lazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19592<i>There is no way to interpret Clinton's answers as truthful</i>TigerPaw-8/21/2002
19591There is no way to interpret Clinton's answers as truthful. Even he doesn&#Original Mad Dog-8/21/2002
19590<i>Either the oath means you tell the truth or it means you are free to liTigerPaw-8/21/2002
19589Thanks for not answering the question. Either the oath means you tell the truthOriginal Mad Dog-8/21/2002
19588That's the difference between laws and justice. Most trials involve some diTigerPaw-8/21/2002
19587In this particular case, my distaste at seeing a President lie under oath is balDayuhan-8/21/2002
19586TP, If you are in a lawsuit, and your opponent lies under oath to the jury or tOriginal Mad Dog-8/21/2002
19585No dipshit, lying under oath in a judicial proceeding, even after the BillyBubbajlallen-8/21/2002
19584<i>can face severe penalties</i> Only with anal-retentive prosecuterTigerPaw-8/21/2002
19583Once the die has been cast (as he can do under the War Powers Act, which gives hE-8/21/2002
19582<i> The war would be illegal, the group argues. The dispute with Iraq overTimF-8/21/2002
19581Bush HAS to deal with Congress on this. He has no choice. He is not a dictatorLazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19580Credible or not if they do testify under oath and lie they have committed perjurTimF-8/21/2002
19579Here's an intelligent piece by Robert Wright. (He's the author of a bookE-8/21/2002
19578I hope you're right. One element in the developing picture that has gotten mE-8/21/2002
19577<i>power and the prestige and influence that he brought her</i> LOL!Lazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19576Could be. To get much international support, he's going to have to sell theLazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19575As soon as Bush makes the case, he will have all the support he needs....He justjlallen-8/21/2002
19574Overly pessimistic, I think. The Bush administration isn't suicidal. A lotLazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19573War speculation in Ridgeway's VV column: November Surprise? Vacationing BusE-8/21/2002
19572LL, I seriously doubt that bill and hilly have slept in the same bed for many yeBridge Player-8/21/2002
19571Of course, if that's the case, you have to wonder why they got elected in thLazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19570Ah. OK. But I thought it was stronger than that- -that they weren't alloweLazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19569<i>Is this because Barr initiated the impeachment of Clinton?</i> WLane3-8/21/2002
19568<i>I seem to recall that some decades back, spouses couldn't testify aLane3-8/21/2002
19567I should have said + and - screwdrivers.Ish-8/21/2002
19566I suspect that when they went to bed, there were three guns in that bed- -Hill hLazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19565Is this because Barr initiated the impeachment of Clinton? MSNBC's story: mLazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19564I know what a Phillips and a flathead are (who doesn't?), but I hadn't hLazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19563Not to mention that Bill and Hill had a long close trusting monogamous relationsOriginal Mad Dog-8/21/2002
19562Way to go, Georgia! Good riddance to the likes of Barr and McKinney.Lane3-8/21/2002
19561Yes. + Phillips screwdriver. - Flathead screwdriver. The guy didn't know theIsh-8/21/2002
19560That's a big loss.Ish-8/21/2002
19559<i>The guy didn't know the difference between a + and a - screwdriver.Lazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19558And Canada told us today we're on our own.Lazarus_Long-8/21/2002
19557You said: <i>They didn't care, that is why spouse's don't testLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19556Daym good one there. You are invited to post whenever you want on- Subject 5315Ish-8/20/2002
19555You mean McDonalds stopped carrying them?Bridge Player-8/20/2002
19554<<I have a feeling I don't want to know what that means. :-)>> Ish-8/20/2002
19553You must have skipped out on jury duty. Spouses and ex-spouses do not make credTigerPaw-8/20/2002
19552<i>I will say he was one of the nicest neighbors I've ever had except Lazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19551The US has already built 8 bases IN IRAQ. Does this mean we can do? I bet we getIsh-8/20/2002
19550<<And no work! All right! How do I apply? :-)>> First you have to hIsh-8/20/2002
19549Hubris is the poison of empires. The US appears to pushing close to proving thaLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19548Gee, have you heard a spouse CAN be under oath in a courtroom? And is still expLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19547And no work! All right! How do I apply? :-) What's wrong with this pictLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19546The American people didn't care because the demolibs obscured the real issuejlallen-8/20/2002
19545<i>American people seemed not to care about that.</i> They didn'TigerPaw-8/20/2002
19544Oh, I do appreciate the distinction. I was very disappointed that the American Original Mad Dog-8/20/2002
19543Clinton didn't get into trouble for lying about sex. Clinton got into troubLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19542<i>The real key problem here is not conquering these clowns. It is puttingLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19541In light of your recent Clinton criticisms, I thought it might be fun to look atOriginal Mad Dog-8/20/2002
19540<i> and will sue you if AA goes bankrupt and that happens.</i> HmmphLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19539<i>sodium has the same number of letters as Satan</i> Need help witLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19538Qatar has the disadvantage of being some distance from Iraq and sharing no bordeLazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19537Thanks. I have been travelling on and off all month, so I have been posting spoOriginal Mad Dog-8/20/2002
19536My friend was in a minimum security and he got tennis lessons in the afternoon. Ish-8/20/2002
19535Welcome back, OMD. We were wondering if you had disappeared from this thread. Lazarus_Long-8/20/2002
19534We were wondering about the minimum security prisons.Lazarus_Long-8/20/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):