2000-Year of the Biotechs! | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
2000-Year of the Biotechs!

An SI Board Since December 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1142	41	0

Emcee: Arthur Radley	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
217	Those cheapie stocks make nice looking percentage moves simply because the sect	Michael Young	-	2/7/2000
216	Mostly true...however in post 205 a person might have linked over to another	Mike McFarland	-	2/7/2000
215	Return, Couldn't agree more....there will always be a "tailwagger"	Arthur Radley	-	2/7/2000
214	Consistent with the tone of this thread this evening, I find there is an attitu	scott_jiminez	-	2/7/2000
213	Any sector list will be comprised of both leaders and laggards. The interesting	Return to Sender	-	2/7/2000
212	Mike, I appreciate your candor about my list of stocks. However, I might remind	Arthur Radley	-	2/7/2000
211	Mike, We need to see your top ten this weekend and then we can compare your LT	Jack Hartmann	-	2/7/2000
210	Sorry. ABGX. MIKE	Michael Young	-	2/7/2000
209	<i>ABX </i> Last time I checked ABX was a gold stock.	bluejeans	-	2/7/2000
208	I'm not a big fan of the list. A great biotech bull market and he puts tog	Michael Young	-	2/7/2000
207	The strength of the overall moves in a number of the sectors listed there even	Return to Sender	-	2/7/2000
206	Strange that there are no strong genomics plays like Human Genome Science or Af	Graham Dellaire	-	2/7/2000
205	If somebody wants to enter symbols into Yahoo for the next hour, I'd set u	Mike McFarland	-	2/7/2000
204	The charts associated with the list were an eye opener. The breadth of the biot	jayhawk969	-	2/7/2000
203	I like this list and feel you have done a great job putting it together. As a	mark collins	-	2/7/2000
202	Mike I am a bit of a bottom fisher myself. Biotech has long been a favorite of	Return to Sender	-	2/6/2000
201	Gosh, I'd not have sounded so critical if I'd known it was your persona	Mike McFarland	-	2/6/2000
200	Every list has to start somewhere. This one started with a biotech list from Y	Return to Sender	-	2/6/2000
199	Having the charts laid out for you by that website puts Icos and Hyseq charts	Mike McFarland	-	2/6/2000
198	Dude, Please send me what you got on RMBS. I still like it, but it's a ve	NickD	-	2/6/2000
197	The stocks in the Biotechnology Sector have shown some of the best gains in any	Return to Sender	-	2/6/2000
196	One factor in the biotech rise has been monoclonal antibodies (mabs). After ye	Sea Otter	-	2/6/2000
195	( modern medicine is wonderful) In this case modern medicine came up with this:	Mike McFarland	-	2/6/2000
194	Mike, Being a father, my thoughts and best wishes will be with you and your wif	Arthur Radley	-	2/6/2000
193	Mr. Harmon what do you think of TRGNY. Is this a top dog or one of the foll	megazoo	-	2/6/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):